PRIORY OF SION: THE FACTS, THE THEORIES, THE MYSTERY

PRIORY OF SION: THE FACTS, THE THEORIES, THE MYSTERY

Introduction

It has been seven years since I wrote my first article on the Priory of Sion/Rennes-les-Chateau mystery. At the time, I was heavily under the influence of the books Holy Blood, Holy Grail and Lionel Fanthorpe's work. Since then, there have been a number of books released, some better, some worse, than these original influences. I have revised some of my theories, challenged some of my own assumptions, learned some new things, and encountered a great deal of contrary data. Now, I am no longer sure that the hypothesis presented at the end of Holy Blood, Holy Grail is the best for explaining the data, nor am I sure that a Priory of Sion with the characteristics ascribed to it (an 800-year uninterrupted history, 9000 members internationally) really exists. I also am not sure that what is presented as "orthodox" with regard to the Sauniere saga can really be trusted. Still, although I have encountered the work of the debunkers, I am sure of two and only two things:

1. the Sauniere saga cannot be explained away simply by a mass-trafficking pyramid scheme and a bad taste in décor.
2. Something called the Order de Sion existed in the Middle Ages up until, at the latest, the 17th century; something called the Prieure du Sion existed from at least 1956 to 1984; whether these two things have any actual relationship to each other, I am still trying to figure out.

I believe that people get lost in certain obsessive details regarding this mystery, in particular details having to do with the life of Jesus, the idea of some type of mysterious bloodline with genes from (G-d/aliens/angels/Nephilim/Merovech/take your pick), lost artefacts (the Shroud of Turin, the Ark of the Covenant, the Holy Grail, the head of John the Baptist, etc.), or conspiracy theories (on the part of the Catholic Church, the French Geographic Institute/IGN, and various ludicrous New World Orders). In this essay, I'm going to attempt to present my current, "millennial" take on this mystery. I will actually attempt to argue beyond the mere basis of statements a and b, but I will attempt to present why I believe this is the case. Since this is not a scholarly essay, it will not be heavily referenced and footnoted, but I believe all assertions in here are defensible, and can present the sources on which I think they are based. Many ideas in here come from the three years of discussion I have had on the priory-of-sion egroups list, with a wide-ranging variety of erudite minds.

In lieu of writing a book on this subject, which I really at this time don't want to do, I think this essay is one of the better ways to communicate my current thoughts on this subject. I apologize for any errors in advance, but cannot claim infallibility, only a desire for accuracy. Should any of these things be proved false, I am fully willing to withdraw those statements. Unlike others writing on this subject, I have no agenda, no desire to manipulate or deceive, only to deal with the information and offer my theories and interpretations. I have decided the best way to present this data is chronologically.

Some would begin this story back in the hoary mists of prehistory, or in the time of Jesus, or with the coming of the Merovingian Franks to Gaul, or in ancient Sumeria. I prefer to start at one particular place.

1090 - 1188 The Ordre de Sion

According to the "prieure documents," a conclave of Calabrian monks who left from the Belgian Abbey of Orval in 1090 helped secure the election of Godfroi de Bouillion as de facto king of Jerusalem during the First Crusade (but as is well known, he refused the title, accepting only Defender of the Holy Sepulchre), based on their belief that he was a descendant of the Merovingians, and by that fact, according to these documents, also a descendant of King David through Jesus and Merovech. In return, Godfroi secured their installation into an Abbey on Mount Sion. These documents also claim that the Ordre of Sion and the Order of the Temple (officially, the Poor Knights of the Temple of Solomon, later known as the Knights Templar, and officially recognized as such in 1118) were, until 1188, one unified organization with the same leadership.

Is there any basis to these claims? Here is what it is apparently true: there was indeed an Order of Sion based on Mt. Sion, and according to a papal bull of the 12th century, it had monasteries and abbeys elsewhere in Palestine (in particular, Mount Carmel), in southern Italy (Calabria), and in France. There is little in the official histories linking Godfroi to this order, but he is said to have founded the Order of the Holy Sepulchre, whose relationships to these other orders (the Temple and Sion) are unclear. And the official histories do not indicate any overlap between these monks and the soldier-monks of the Knights Templar. The Order seems to have occupied its "mother" abbey, Notre Dame de Sion/St. Mary of Mt. Zion, built on the foundations of the original apostolic Cenacle or Coelaneum, up until around 1291 or so, when like many Crusader holdings, it was overwhelmed by the Moslem onslaught. It actually was in the hands of the Franciscans for several more centuries, until it finally was lost to Christian ownership and was converted to a mosque.

I have found interesting links between the Order de Sion and the Carmelites. St. Berthold, the founder of the Carmelites, also originated from Calabria. Fra Lippi, a tutor of Botticelli, who is listed as a PoS GM, lived in Calabria and was known as "The Carmelite". Crotone in Calabria was the home of the Pythagorean school, and Pythagoras is said by Iamblichus to have visited Mount Carmel. Calabria was the "stomping grounds" of Joachim of Fiore and Giordano Bruno. Most interestingly, recent archaeological articles suggest the Essenes had encampments on both Mount Carmel and Mount Zion. St. Therese of Liseux turns up in a number of "PoS churches", and she took her name both from Theresa of Avila, a Discalced Carmelite and mystic, and Therese of Lidoine, a Carmelite nun who was murdered by the Revolutionary Terror in Compeigne.

The Abbey of Orval's web site says only that mysterious monks from Calabria came there in 1070, although little is known about their identity, and they were welcomed there by Count Arnould de Chiny. These "pioneers" moved out after forty years, i.e. around 1110. The legend of Orval claims that it was named by Mathilda de Tuscany, who after finding a lost ring declared the place "a Valley of Gold" (Val D'Or.) That name will turn up again... recent research also suggests that Nostradamus may have found some "Templar" materials at the Abbey of Orval.

What I have found quite interesting about this Order is their choice of real estate. According to a recent (1990) issue of Biblical Archaeology magazine, Mt. Sion seems to have been the "HQ" of the Ebionites of Jerusalem - those "Judaizing" followers of Jesus who looked to his brother James, rather than the "Apostle" Paul, for leadership. Pauline Christians, in fact, avoided the place until the Byzantine period (7th century). It looks like some of these followers even made an abortive attempt to build a 3rd Temple of Solomon on the site after the Great Revolt of 70 CE, using the ruins of the destroyed Herodian templeÖ an effort that seems to have come to an end with the decisive defeat of the Messiah Bar Kochba in 135 CE. This choice does not appear arbitrary: the Old Testament says that Solomon's Temple sat on Mt. Zion, which although identified with Mt. Moriah for many centuries, by the 2nd Temple period was once again recognized as a mountain outside the existing Jerusalem city walls. I believe their choice of Mt. Sion for their Abbey displays an obvious "Ebionite" outlook on their part.

However, it seems like several monks had vacated from this Abbey prior to its emptying in 1291, and it does appear that quite a few went back to Orleans, France with King Louis in the 12th century. Others went to southern Italy (Calabria was the home of the heresies of Joachim of Fiore - a very unorthodox territory). The Order of Sion did not apparently cease to exist, though, even after losing its "mother" abbey in Jerusalem, and according to one perhaps less than totally reliable authority, Gerard de Sede, it continued on for quite some time, until being absorbed by the Jesuits in the 17th century. Prior to this dissolution, though, the "prieure documents" claim Sion and the Templars underwent a separation, at an event called the 'cutting of the elm' at Gisors in 1188. The "prieure documents" claim Sion's first independent "grand master", Jean de Gisors, was elected at this time: Sion and the Temple were no longer under the same leadership, and each went its own way.

This event, like so many others, appears to be based on some historical events, but perhaps shrouded with the clouds of myth. We know that there was indeed an ancient elm tree at the fortress of Gisors, often used as a neutral meeting point for the monarchs of England and France. And, indeed, there was a "parting of the ways" that occurred there, but it was not a division between Sion and the Templars. In January of 1188, the kings of England and France agreed to a truce at this elm tree, so that they could launch yet another common Crusade to the Holy Land. But in August, further meetings at the tree resulted in the collapse of this truce. One side became agitated over the fact that the other was hogging all the shade from the tree, the French and English skirmished, and finally it was cut down after a bloody battle. There is no evidence that Jean de Gisors was there or the Templars, but it seems hard to see why either would be uninvolved with a struggle that occurred in their physical and moral backyards.

Thomas a Beckett met with papal legates at the tree of Gisors, after his "excommunication" of some opponents (including a Hugh St. Clair) at Vezelay. Beckett appears to have been an important figure for Jean de Gisors, who dedicated several buildings to him. He was "martyred" on December 28th, the Feast of the Holy Innocents, for refusing to back down over his stance on the separation of sacerdotal and royal authority. Gisors also has a weird "parallel legend" to RlC: whereas RlC's daemon guardian must be defeated at noon (probably on the summer solstice), Gisor's "treasure" is guarded by a daemon who can only be passed at midnight on December 24th (the winter solstice).

1188 - 1307: The Rise and Fall of the Templars

Although the Order de Sion and the Knights Templar parted ways, at least according to the "prieure documents", in 1188, they still seem to have had some sort of interconnection, and some artefacts, knowledge, documents, etc. relating to the current 'mystery' seem to have remained in the Templars' possession. Thus, a great deal of investigation into the PoS/RlC mystery seems to revolve around the mysteries of the Templars. Did they possess some type of treasure? Were they heretics, dabbling in Ebionism, Johannism, or Essenism? Did they have some kind of "hands off" pact with the Cathars of southern France? Did they continue to survive in some kind of clandestine fashion after the order's "official" dissolution?

Again, here is what can be known. During their short but meteoric career, the Knights Templar became known for more than just their skill as soldiers or their piety. They became bankers, diplomats, and power-brokers. An elite few even became scholars, attempting to translate Hebrew Old Testament texts (such as the Book of Maccabees) into the vernacular. Charges of heresy and disloyalty dogged them for a long time, even as early as the early 12th century. Some of this undoubtedly arose from envy: as the bankers of Europe, the Temple acquired quite a formidable stash of gold. As it turns out, while northern Templars pursued the Albigensian Crusade with relish, gleefully slaughtering the Cathar heretics in the name of the Pope, southern Templars seem to have been more reluctant to take up arms against their neighbors. Scholars have argued whether this might have had to do with political loyalties (to the kingdom of Aragon) or family ties, but in any case, it does seem somewhat puzzling.

In 1307, on the rather inauspicious date of Friday, October 13th, King Philip the Fair ordered the arrest of the Templars on the charges of heresy. Historians conclude he was mostly after their wealth, having already seized the assets of the Jews in his realm a year earlier. Legal inquiries ensued, and Grand Master Jacques de Molay was thrown in prison. In 1312, during the Council of Vienne, the Pope (who was in Philip's "pocket"), dissolved the Templars as a religious order. Finally, in 1314, after refusing to renounce his claim of innocence, Jacques de Molay was burned at the stake in Paris as a relapsed heretic. Outside of France, Templars endured different levels of treatment - in some countries, they were hardly bothered at all, while in France they suffered torture, harassment, and vigorous persecution. Also, outside of France, the charges were more widely viewed with disbelief. The King and Pope did not outlast deMolay by long, dying several months after him.

As for their orthodoxy, the only real evidence that the Templars were anything less than pious, dumb, and loyal Catholic knights is their testimony at their trial. And, sadly, most of this testimony has to be ruled out, since most of it was obtained under torture. While under the hot irons of the inquisitors, the Templars admitted to intercourse with demons, worshipping black cat familiars, sodomy, and black magic, charges that no scholar takes seriously. In truth, these type of charges are a familiar litany that often turns up when a persecuted group was tortured by the inquisition - they show up during the witch-trials of two centuries later, and of trials of other Gnostic heretics centuries before. Thus, they probably reflect more of the demon-obsessed mind of the inquisitors than anything else.

Yet, there is a hidden "subtext" which suggests that, although many of the charges were trumped up in a Stalinesque (or Kafkaesque) kangaroo court (which we will return to later), heresy was already brewing among the Templars. For one thing, many Templars made a rather confusing confession. They claim they went through initiations by their superiors in which they were told to worship G-d the Father, but were also to spit on the cross and deny the Trinity. This is not the type of thing normally confessed to under torture by someone trying to tell their confessor what they wanted to hear, so the torture would end. After all, why not just say they had gone over to the Devil's side, rather than simply declaring that they had adopted a non-Trinitarian (perhaps "Ebionite"?) Christianity? Many people think the Templars incapable of heresy because they were unintellectual fighting men. However, the heresies of the Middle Ages often spread primarily among illiterate peasants.

A number of Templars outside of France, including some in England, were never tortured, yet made similar confessions. Indeed, many claim that the main heresiarch within the order was Roncelin de Fos, a 13th century Templar who was of Cathar ancestry. At some point, Roncelin began forming clandestine "cells" within the order, spreading his heretical teachings and initiations. Apparently, the leadership was unaware of this internal 'virus,' which may be why De Molay went to the grave honestly protesting his innocence - he truly had no knowledge of heresy within the order. There is also the possibility that some rather innocent deviations on the part of the Templars were simply misunderstood as "heresy" by their inquisitors and blown out of proportion. Whatever the case may be, charges suggesting the Templars were heretics went back to the 1140s - while, interestingly, their 'companion' order, the Knights Hospitaller of St. John, never faced similar chargesÖ but the only remotely heretical artefact the inquisitors ever found was a silver woman's head in a Templar perceptory marked "Caput LVIIIm".

If the Templars ever had a "treasure" other than a great stack of florins, history doesn't record it. Certainly, there are a number of Masonic ritual degrees (like the Holy Royal Arch) that suggest that they conducted some exploration on the Temple Mount, and either found some scrolls or the Ark of the Covenant itself. Other sources, like Ian Wilson, claim they had the "Mandylion" or Shroud of Turin prior to its display at Lirey in the 1350s. And, of course, there are always the persistent rumors that they held secret negotiations with the Hashisheen or Assassins led by the Old Man of the Mountain, Hassan-I-Sabah, or the Druzes of Lebanon, and from them obtained some esoteric materials. Although sources seem to disagree as to whether this treasure was spiritual, material, or documentary, this has not stopped people from looking for it, at Rosslyn Chapel, Gisors, Rennes-les-Chateau, Stenay, and elsewhere.

Equally in dispute has been the fate of the Templars after their 1312 dissolution. In many countries, they were simply folded into "new" military orders which consisted of the same people under a different name - for example, the Knights of Christ in Portugal. In England and in many countries, some went on to join their former friendly rivals, the Hospitallers. This may have been a good decision, considering the number of assets of the Templars turned over to their rivals. In France, most of the knights hung up their swords and retired to non-military monasteries, although a few went "rogue" and became mercenaries, pirates, or freebooters. However, there have always been the persistent rumors that the Templar order "survived" in some clandestine form after its own dissolution. For example, the Charter of Larmenius says that before de Molay died, he appointed a "clandestine" Grand Master to continue the order in defiance of the Pope's bull. Many of the "neo-Templar" orders of today claim they are the continuation of this 'survival', often with little or no proof. And, of course, there are those who say the Freemasons are the heirs of the Knights Templar.

Whatever the "PoS" is or was, it seems to have some interest in the Templar legacy, because in their documents they indicate some interest in Templar "materials" supposedly left behind at Gisors, where many Templars were imprisoned or detained. Assuming there is any validity to the "prieure documents" account, Sion and the Temple would have maintained some type of contact with each other, and the OdS would probably have some awareness of the disposition of their "sibling" order's people, property, and materiel.

1307 - 1600: The Reign of the White Queen

Itís not clear what exactly the OdS was up to in the 14th- 17th centuries, although the "prieure" documents suggest that during this time it had some fairly august leadership: Leonardo da Vinci, Nicholas Flamel, Rene D' Anjou, and Sandro Filipepi (better known as Botticelli). The alchemist Flamel translated the mysterious text of the Sacred Magic of Abra-Melin, whose original author was one "Abraham the Jew," through the assistance of some Spanish Rabbis. Upon his return from Spain, he is said to have achieved the "Great Work" of alchemy on the "PoS date" of January 17th. As for "Good King Rene," he seems to have been one of the figures promoting the mythic theme of Arcadia in Europe, a theme that seems an idee fixe for the "PoS". It is the appearance of daVinci on this roster - daVinci, the visionary, the artist, the man who wrote in backwards mirror writing, the inventor, the man who some say put his own face on the Shroud (although others claim it is de Molay's) - that has people most fascinated.

DaVinci seems to have had a "thing" for John the Baptist, which seems quite consonant with the apparent "PoS" interest in Johannism (the idea that John was the true Messiah and Jesus a false one, or, alternatively, that they were equal co-Messiahs). Johannites believe that there was a secret teaching passed from John the Baptist to John the Beloved Disciple (whose given name was Lazarus, but he took the "alias" of John to honor the Baptist), and to a "John" ever since. (Supposedly, every PoS GrandMaster takes the name "Jean" as an honorary title, in addition to being known as "Nautonnier" or Navigator.) Pincknett and Prince believe Da Vinci put his own face on the Shroud of Turin (despite accounts which suggest it was first shown at Lirey 200 years earlier), which was confirmed to them by someone they believed to be a member of the PoS, "Giovanni".

During this time period, the Duke Jean de Berry, who lived in Bourges, commissioned a picture-book known as Les Tres Riches Heures. A horological manuscript, illustrating the seasons of the calendar as well as miscellaneous episodes, the Heures has fascinated people with some of its strange symbolism. For example, it shows the Duke de Berry holding a caduceus or serpent-staff. The picture of the Resurrection also seems somewhat oddly dissonant with New Testament accounts, also. Certain scenes in the Heures also appear to be alluded to by the Rennes-les-Bains cleric Henri Boudet. The 20th century alchemist "Fulcanelli" had a lot to say about hidden symbolism in the Heures, and he in particular pointed to the role of Jacques Coeur of Bourges in its creation. Bourges is considered the esoteric "Coeur" of France.

Queen Blanche d'Evereaux, "The White Queen" of many prieure documents and listed as a PoS GM in those documents, had a chateau near Gisors at Neaufles. There was supposed to be a secret tunnel linking Gisors with her chateau. In the Prisoner's Tower at Gisors was imprisoned one Nicholas Poulain, an ambassador of the Douglasses of Scotland, allegedly for being Blanche's secret lover. Poulain supposedly scrawled a number of alchemical and hermetic diagrams on the walls of his jail. Poulain may have been connected to the "Freres-Aines de la Rose-Croix," a group of "survivor" Templar alchemists in Scotland. Blanche may have given some of his secrets to her "PoS successor," Nicholas Flamel, whose sigils and diagrams in his published works resemble Poulain's. Flamel's brother worked for Jean de Berry. As you can see, all these people curiously interconnect.

(A group called the Freres-Aines was "re-established" in the 20th century by Daniel Caro, who called himself "Gaston Phoebus" after the original man who attempted to bring the Freres-Aines from Scotland to France at the behest of Cardinal Jean-Jacques D'Ossa, the future Pope John XXII, who was present at the Council of Vienne. One of the few places the story of the original Freres-Aines can be found is in Gaetan Delaforge's book on the Templar tradition; "Delaforge" (a pseudonym) was a member of the Solar Temple.)

In 1446, the cornerstone for Rosslyn Chapel was laid. The history of Rosslyn and the Sinclairs who were its lords since the 1280s - they appear to have inherited it from the French de Roscelin family - is like many other things, highly disputed. The Sinclairs claim to be descended from the Norman Santo-Claros ("Clear Light") of St.-Clair-sur-Epte. The "prieure documents" also claim that Hugh de Payns married one Catherine St. Clair, thus establishing a Sinclair presence in the Templars from early on. Finally, they also claim the Sinclairs to have been the hereditary "patrons" of Scottish Freemasonry for several centuries. The implications are obvious; the "priory docs" present the Sinclairs as the "interface" between Templarism and Masonry.

1600-1780: The Cabal of the Devout

This appears to be an interesting time in the PoS saga, according to the "prieure documents". Apparently, at some point during this time period, the "old" Order de Sion faded from the scenes, but it seems to have transferred some of its ideas and personnel into the Order of St. Sulpice (Sulpicians), the Lazarists of St. Vincent de Paul, the Discalced Carmelites, and perhaps most particularly, a group lampooned by Moliere as a "cabal of the devout" - the Compagnie du St.-Sacrament. The "prieure documents" claim that the Compagnie, which history records primarily as a religious anti-Jansenist movement in France, actually were one of the primary agents behind the "Fronde" against King Louis (and, moreso, his closest advisor Cardinal Mazarin). They claim that they were supporting the Guise-Lorraine families' bid for the throne, and that the man today known as Nostradamus may have been providing "timetables" for the action of the conspirators.

One thing that seems to have made the PoS so angry was Louis XIV's decision, carried out by Colbert, to give France a new national Meridian, based on the observatory in Paris, as calculated by the astronomer Cassini. "Le Serpent Rouge" and other "prieure documents" maintain that in fact, France already had a far older N-S meridian known as the "roseline," and that all Colbert and Cassini did was move it to the wrong place. This roseline or "serpent rouge" seems to have run through several hermetic churches in France, including St. Sulpice in Paris, the Lady of the Roses cathedral in Rodez, St. Vincent's in Carcasonne, and the Church of St. Stephen's in Bourges. Most importantly, it also ran through Rennes-les-Bains, whose name itself comes from Rhedae or Rhodos, meaning "roses". A more romantic line used for its time-telling, geomantic, religious significance was replaced with a much more staid line for travel and commerce.

They seem to have been concerned about this, because in the 1750's in St. Sulpice a copper line was drawn in the floor, and a gnomon or meridian marker installed, as if to remind people that it was once a meridian church. The Sulpicians themselves took their name from Sulpicius, a bishop of Bourges in Merovingian times. Curiously, they themselves went on to found the city of Montreal in Canada, and there they erected a Notre Dame cathedral in the 'geomantic' center of the city. Their symbol, two crossed M's, seems to turn up in other "hermetic" contexts. Another group the "PoS" seems to have been involved with during this time, according to the "prieure documents", were the Essene and Cathar-like Camisards, known for their white shirts of purity and holiness.

During this time, the painter Poussin is active, as is another painter, David Teniers the Younger (he is the 2nd - his father and his son were also both David Teniers). This is important, as their names will turn up later. Poussin is said to have known a great "secret" which he refused to reveal. There are those who say his painting "Shepherds of Arcadia" depicts an actual tomb, the so-called "Poussin Tomb", in the RlC area.

1781 - 1901: The Rose-Croix

It is during this time that the PoS and the RlC sagas begin to overlap, at least according to the "prieure documents". In 1781, Marie Negre d'Hautpoul, a resident of Rennes-les-Chateau died. Her family had been involved in Memphis-Misraim and Martinist Freemasonry. What happened after seems to be in dispute (as always), but the "prieure documents" suggest that her confessor, the Abbe Bigou, moved a meridian marker with the words "Et in Arcadia Ego" from a tomb elsewhere on the "roseline" (some say this is the "Arques" or Pontils Tomb which supposedly appears in Poussin's painting) to her gravesite, and then erected a second tombstone with an odd inscription on it. This inscription is apparently a cipher, and even contains Bigou's own name on it. Bigou also supposedly writes two ciphered parchments and has them buried along with other documents (including geneaologies and a Hautpoul "testimony") in his church in RlCÖ to be discovered two hundred years later, after the chaos of the French Revolution.

In the early 1800's, Charles Nodier and Victor Hugo organize a literary salon at the Arsenal Library where Nodier worked, known as the Cenacle. Nodier and Hugo were good friends, and are listed by the "prieure documents" as successive PoS grandmasters. I believe the Cenacle represents the earliest traceable root of the 'real' or 'modern' PoS, which I think began as a 19th century society of Romantics, artists, surrealists, and Symbolists who may or may not have had any real (more likely, it was indirect) connection to the earlier OdS, and who adopted "Et in Arcadia Ego" as their properly elegiac and romantic motto. It is possible that the librarian Nodier may have discovered a number of key texts in the Arsenal library, such as Flamel's translated texts. As for Hugo, he dabbled heavily in Spiritualism and arcana, and he is now an "ascended master" in the Vietnamese religion Cao Dai.

After Hugo, the "prieure documents" claim that the next "grand master" of the "PoS" was Claude Debussy, the composer. Once again, Debussy seems like an unlikely candidate for such a role, but digging into his biography suggests otherwise. Debussy was introduced to Josephin Peladan's Rose-Croix through his friend Erik Satie (and Satie emerges as the bridge between Debussy, Cocteau, and Picasso). Through the Rose-Croix, whose members also included the opera singer Emma Calve, Georges "Count Israel" Monti (mentor of a man who will emerge later, Pierre Plantard), and Eliphas Levi, Debussy may have come to meet the Sulpician scholar Emile Hoffet, and more importantly, another man, Berenger Sauniere.

I will not go into great detail over the Sauniere saga here, as there are other sites which do it far more thoroughly and comprehensively. What Sauniere did or did not do or find is in dispute. He became the parish priest of Rennes-les-Chateau in 1885, and after living through a period of initial extreme deprivation, started displaying a bizarre ostentatious display of sudden wealth. He came under suspicion, was defrocked by the church in 1912, and died in 1917. However, there are two myths about his death that need to be put to rest. He did not die on January 17th, and his coffin was ordered six months before his death (not 5 days). Many also say that Father Riviere, his confessor, denied him last rites and that his funeral was somewhat bizarre. The "prieure documents" claim that Sauniere found Bigou's hidden parchments in 1891, and with Hoffet's help, deciphered the ciphers (encoded within two excerpts from the Gospels). These two ciphers are, of course, legendary at this point. The first said, quite simply:

THIS TREASURE BELONGS TO DAGOBERT II KING AND TO SION AND HE IS THERE DEAD.

The second said:

SHEPHERDESS NO TEMPTATION THAT POUSSIN TENIERS HOLD THE KEY PEACE 681 BY THE CROSS AND THIS HORSE OF GOD I DESTROY THIS DAEMON GUARDIAN AT MIDDAY. BLUE APPLES.

Who composed these ciphers is also in dispute, although I agree with my friend Ted Cranshaw that evidence suggests they were generated in the 18th century, and in all likelihood by the Abbe Bigou, not by modern pranksters (i.e. the Marquis de Cherisey). The last one must be deciphered by using a knight's tour of the chessboard, along with the de Vigenere substitution technique. Interestingly, the key for the cipher, "MORT EPEE", comes from the Marie de Negre tombstone, whose entire 128-letter text is a perfect anagram for the ciphertext, minus 14 extraneous letters.

It is claimed that the second cipher refers to three paintings, Poussin's Shepherds of Arcadia, Teniers' Temptation of St. Anthony, and a portrait of Celestine V, all of which Sauniere supposedly went to view at the Louvre during a trip to Paris. (This trip is, like so many other matters, disputed.) The cipher would seem to indicate that these two artists "hold the key," but while some think they know the significance of the Poussin reference (it supposedly points to the "Pontils Tomb"), the importance of Teniers' painting is not clear (he did about five Temptations, each slightly different from the others). However, of the paintings of Teniers that I have been able to see, there seems to be an interesting obscure symbolism that the artist associated with St. Anthony the Hermit - whose feast day is that recurring date, January 17th. As for the painting of Celestine V, its significance is also unknown, although Celestine is the only pope to have resigned his office: what Dante called "The Great Refusal". Incidentally, the Poussin painting appears as a relief, in reverse, at the Shugborough Hall Shepherds' Monument in England, along with a strange cipher beneath it which seems to be the initial letters of a verse from 18th century Romantic poetry.

Sauniere's church contains a daemon guardian, a statue of Asmodeus, and there are those who say that at noon an optical effect that looks like "blue apples" appears through the stained glass windows. There are those who say Sauniere's paymaster, and the "brains" of his operation, was Father Henri Boudet, the parish priest of Rennes-les-Baines. Boudet was a bit of a crank antiquarian who argued that the original language of the Celts, and the whole world, was English. However, Le Vraie Langue Celtique, his "nut book", contains a number of puns, anagrams, and codesÖ as do the tombs he created for Jean Vie and Paul-Vincent de Fleury. The "prieure documents" seem to hint that Boudet was a PoS operative, and that he located a meridian marker in the RlC region.

1901 - 2000: The PoS Comes into Closer View

Some "prieure documents" suggest Sauniere was loosely connected to a type of aristocratic and Hermetic Freemasonry (despite his being a priest) known as the Hieron du Val d'Or. There seems to be a hint that the Hieron was the "guise" of the "PoS" during that time period. From what people have written about it, the Hieron seems to have been an 'esoteric research center' located at Paray-le-Monial, "ground zero" of the Sacred Heart cult in France. It conducted research into Atlantis and esoteric Catholicism. The "prieure documents" also suggest that after Sauniere's death, the surrealist artist/poet/filmmaker Jean Cocteau became "GM" of the PoS in 1918. Interestingly, right around the same time, Cocteau seems to have partnered with Satie and Picasso on a production (Picasso's work was dominated by PoS-type esoteric themes), and then he and Satie went on to form a musical composing group, "Le Six," that were based on improvisation from Debussy's work. The link between these two "GM"s was Erik Satie.

During the late 1930s and 1940s, which was the period of the Vichy Occupation of France, a young man known only as "Pierre de France," aka Pierre Plantard, aka Plantard de St.-Clair, began publishing a journal called Vaincre, which issued from a group calling itself Alpha Galates. Vaincre's writers included a number of esoteric and political figures. It states that the goals of Alpha Galates were a European federation/union centered on France, the unity of France within its own borders, and a revived chivalry and patriotic feeling. Vaincre also carried stories that were anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic; when asked about this by authors Baigent, Lincoln, and Leigh, Plantard simply said that he had to run stories of that type in order to get it past the Gestapo - really, he and Poirer Murat were actually sending message to the Maquis or Resistance. In 1943, he claims he was interned at Fresnes for Resistance activity. The Resistance seems to have appreciated Plantard's efforts, because he was tapped by General de Gaulle to help organize some of the Paris Committees of Public Safety which were involved in de Gaulle's return to power.

Of course, others insist Plantard was not on the side of the angels during the war, but like his associate Francois Mitterand, who visited RlC in 1981, he was actually an active Vichy collaborator, and part of the Vichy's Uriage-based "educational movement" to turn the youth of France against modernity and progress. There are even accusations that he used Nazi connections to obtain esoteric documents from Martinists and others. As with other matters, figuring out whose side Plantard during WW II was on seems hard to do. The Gestapo under Klaus Barbie in Lyon was infilitrating, dissolving, and even murdering members of esoteric organizations during the Vichy Occupation. Martinist Constant Chevillon was killed when he fell into a "Synarchic" trap set by members of the Fraternite des Polaires, who were connected to the excavations that SS man Otto Rahn was doing in the South of France, looking for the treasure of Montsegur and/or the Grail.

One thing is certain about Msr. Plantard: his geneaology as presented in the "dossiers secretes" appears to be an utter fabrication. And, whatever relationship he wanted to present to the Sinclairs of Rosslyn, he only added the particle "de St. Clair" to his name in 1964. Plantard claims that in 1946, he left Alpha Galates and was inducted into the PoS by the Abbe Francois Ducaud-Bourget. However, there are similarities between Alpha Galates and the PoS, especially in apparent organizational structure, which suggest some other relationship. One also finds a strange semblance between the PoS "statutes" and the degrees and principles of the Rectified Scottish Rite in France (an outgrowth of the Templar Strict Observance) as well as the Memphis-Misraim branch of Masonry. Plantard may have been introduced to these rites by the Mason Camille Savoire.

Who was in charge between Cocteau's death in 1963 and Plantard's claimed accession in 1981 is not clear, but various sources suggest it was either Ducaud-Bourget, Catholic rightist Marcel Lefebvre, or some sort of triumvirate involving Plantard, an Italian (Merzagora), and an American banker (Gaylord Freeman, from Chicago First National). The "prieure documents" suggest there was a "schism" within the PoS in 1956, between some sort of "Anglo-American contingent" (apparently rightists connected to the Knights of Malta) and the main group. Whatever this "schism" was, it led the schismatics to register the group and its statutes with the French bureau of organizations, giving people their first traceable existence of the group in this year. Plantard claims he healed the "schism" and reunited the group. During this time (1961-1978), his associates began depositing the mysterious "prieure documents" (all having to do with treasure, Rennes-les-Chateau, Merovingians, white queens, and hidden secrets) in the Biblioteque Nationnale, under pseudonyms like "Anthony the Hermit".

Plantard claims that he was made Grand Master of the PoS on January 17th, 1981 (up until that time, he was merely its Secretary-General), coincidentally enough close to the time around which Holy Blood Holy Grail was published. But his term did not last long. In 1984, in an interview published in Messianic Legacy, he told the authors Baigent, Lincoln, and Leigh that certain "maneouvres" by his "Anglo-American" brethren could no longer be put up with, and that he was resigning. He died in February of this year (2000), and there are those who say that the PoS, which was his own creation, or at least became his cult of personality, ceased to exist in 1984. Certainly, all there has been since 1984 is speculation about the group and who is running it. No one has stepped forward to give any more interviews. Some think the PoS is now operating in Barcelona, with a Catalan attorney as its current Grand Master.

The many orders of Sion

1. In 1099, Augustinian canons regular establish the Order of Notre Dame de Sion headquartered in the Abbey of Mt. Sion. An 1178 papal bull by Pope Alexander claims monasteries in Calabria, the Holy Land, Sicily, and elsewhere. Some of these monks appear to have established themselves in Orleans in 1152. This Order appears to have been absorbed into the Jesuits in either 1617 or 1619, but the main source for this remains, unfortunately, Gerard de Sede's 1988 "Les Impostures".
2. In 1393, Ferri de Vaudemont establishes a Confraternity of Our Lady of Sion in Nancy (the Lorraine, near Sion-Vaudemont). Its relationship to the earlier Order of Sion is unknown. If and when this order ceased to exist, I am unaware.
3. There appear to have been two Jacobite organizations in the 18th/19th century that used this name: the Realm of Sion, founded in the 1740s, whose leader at one point was the bishop of Rodez, and which claimed descent from a 16th century order dedicated to Thomas Beckett; and a second organization, The Sovereign Sacred Religious and Military Order of Knights Protectors of the Sacred Sepulchre of Our Lord Jesus Christ and of the Most Holy Temple of Zion, founded in New Zealand in 1848.
4. Only one Order of Notre Dame de Sion actually appears in the Catholic Encyclopedia, and it is the Congregation of Notre Dame de Sion, founded by Marie-Alphonse Ratisbonne in Paris in 1843. This organization has parochial schools in the United States and France. One of its main goals is to convert Jews to Catholicism.
5. In the mid-1800s, a Czech author, Prokop Chochosoulek, wrote a work, The Templars of Bohemia. It was a work of "historical fiction". However, he does mention a Priory of Sion being behind the creation of the Templars. His reference seems to indicate they still existed in his own time.
6. From 1807 to 1817, the Russian mystic and Martinist I.V. Lopukhin edited a Martinist journal called The Messenger of Sion, which dealt with a variety of Jewish and mystical themes.
7. Although never identifying itself as an order of "Sion", an organization formed by the priestly Brothers Baillard, Eugene Michel Vintras (otherwise known as "Elias the Artist", whose mentor was a Madam Bouche who lived near St. Sulpice and went by "Sister Salome"), and the Abbe Joseph Boullan known as the Church of Carmel tried to create a syncretistic Celtic-Christian pilgrimage center at Sion-Vaudemont in the 1850s. This was written about by Lorraine author Maurice Barres in La Colline Inspiree .
8. In 1956, an organization called the Priory of Sion registers with the Annemasse bureau of records. Its four officers are Andre Bonhomme, president; Jean Delaval, Vice-President; Pierre Plantard, Secretary-General; Armand Defago, Treasurer. Whether this organization continued to exist after the resignation of Grand Master Pierre Plantard in 1984, no one knows.
9. Currently headquartered on Saint James, Long Island, is the Grand Perceptory of the Chevaliers of Notre Dame de Sion - their home page is online at this link - it claims its foundation from Marcel Lefebvre and currently says it is under the leadership of Andre Barbeau as an "Exempt Sovereign Military Religious Order". Its mission, it proclaims, is to provide medical psychiatric care to the community [sic] and also to perform interfaith marriages. Its clerical staff, it says, includes the Rev. Paul Boucher and the Rev. Douglas Trees, as well as several Rabbis listed as "Interfaith". The site is vague but would appear to indicate the order was "revitalized" in the 1980s.


The rest of this essay is thematic, dealing with certain themes that recur in the various "prieure documents".

January 17th: This seems to be a "red-letter" day for the PoS. The reason why seems to be that it is the saints' day for three "PoS" saints: Sulpicius of Bourges, Anthony the Hermit, and Roseline de Villeneuve. Sulpicius, who Saint-Sulpice is named after, was the hagiogapher of St. Martin of Tours, a saint who one guidebook says "is frequently associated with places of sacred toponymical significance," as well as pagan tree-cults. St. Anthony is invoked to help heal people suffering from St. Anthony's Fire, a syndrome caused by consuming ergot (which contains LSD); in the Middle Ages, Crusaders brought his body back to the Dauphin region of France. Roseline de Villeneuve was a Carthusian nun, associated with a "rose miracle," who was so saintly that her body remained incorrupt after her death. King Louis is said to have checked if she was still alive, by putting a needle through her eye.

Marie de Negre (d'Ables, d'Hautpoul) is also said to have died on January 17th, 1781, the date on her tombstone. Nicholas Flamel was said to have achieved the Great Work of alchemy on Jan 17th, 1381. It is also claimed that Sigisbert "IV", the son of Dagobert II, arrived in RlC on January 17th, 681 CE. The "priory documents" claim that a new class of "Brethren," the "Children of St. Vincent" or "Free Brothers", were created on January 17th, 1681, in Blois. As you will also see, this group has a fascination with 81s and reversals. Pierre Plantard claims he became grand master in 1981, and in 1891 Sauniere wrote in his diary "excavated a tomb. It rained." Later he would carve 'MISSION 1891" on a pillar.

Another "red letter" day for the PoS seems to be December 23rd... the day that Dagobert II was killed near Stenay in the Ardennes, and also the day that Henri, duc de Guise, was killed in Blois. The PoS apparently has its "convents" in Blois, according to Ean Begg.

Mary Magdalene: The PoS seems to have a great interest in the "Notre-Dame de Lumiere", claiming she is Mary Magdalene. Indeed, they hint that the earliest Notre-Dame churches in France are dedicated to Magdalene, not the Virgin Mary. According to some PoS texts, "Our Lady of France" is the Magdalene, not the Virgin. They also seem to identify her with the Meridian. For some reason, many also seem to think she may have been the progenitor of a 'bloodline' from her 'husband' Jesus - this is the hypothesis proposed at the end of HBHG. Her significance may be something else, however... the Priory clearly seems to associate her with the Black Virgins of France, many of which have been mysteriously disappearing over the last decade. Legends from the 11th century onward claim that the Magdalene came to France, landing at Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer or Marseilles after fleeing Palestine. She appears to have been a wealthy Jewish woman from Migdol in the Galilee, and not a prostitute as many people have claimed.

Merovingians: The "prieure docs" seem to hint obliquely that Merovech, the progenitor of the Merovingians, was a special monarch. The hypothesis in HBHG is that Merovech was descended from Jesus and Mary Magdalene. However, all the "prieure documents" claim is that he was descended from the Benjaminites, the Trojans, and a "Quinotaur" (only deSede and Elizabeth van Buren seem to think this was a being from Sirius.) The "prieure documents" note that the Church betrayed the Merovingians by turning power over to the Carolingians, thus breaking the pact with Clovis. The Merovingians were long-haired kings supposedly born with a special birthmark (a red cross between the shoulderblades), and were known for mixing paganism and occultism with Christianity. They were also "sacred kings" who "reigned but did not rule," leaving the messy business of governing to the mayors of the palace (it was from these Pippinid Mayors that the Carolingians arose). The "dossiers secretes" attempt to present a number of families today - including the Plantards, the Montesquious, and the Hapsburgs - as being descended from the Merovingians. They also implicitly argue that every dynasty since then has, implicitly, been usurpers due to the pact between Clovis and the Church.

The Merovingian dynasty was thought to be wiped out (in reality, a few minor branches survived), but the "prieure documents" claim a line from Dagobert II has survived up until the present. The narrative presented in the "prieure documents" has little or no corroboration in historical sources, but it suggests that Dagobert II's son Sigisbert IV survived his father's assassination by Pepin the Short in the Forest of Woivres in 679, and came to Rennes-les-Chateau in 681. Sigisbert was supposedly the ancestor of Guillem de Gellone, the Jewish exilarch of Septimania, a royal pretender named "Ursus", and Godfroi de Bouillion. "Orthodox" geneaology does not support these claims.

Sirius: In 1973, Gerard de Sede claimed in La Race Fabuleuse that the Merovingians were descended from beings from Sirius, thus irrevocably linking the PoS mysteries to the "Sirius Mystery". Sirius is a complex subject in the world of esoterica. Antonin Artaud wrote a play about the "Dog Star" in the 1920s, called "The Broken Firmament", suggesting it was of interest to the Surrealists. Since the 1970s, a number of people have claimed contact by the Sirians - Robert Anton Wilson, Timothy Leary, Philip K. Dick, etc., shortly after the publication of Robert K. Temple's Sirius Mystery, claiming that the Dogon tribe of Mali had been given knowledge of this binary star by "Nommos" from that solar system. Crowleyans like Kenneth Grant claim that "Lam," the being that communicated the Liber AL, was from Sirius. And Sirius, in the form of the "Ennead of Heliopolis," also talked to Andrija Puharich, Uri Geller, and a group of channelers organized by Puharich. However, to find the weird links between this group and what the authors term "The Stargate Conspiracy", a fascist plot to make the planet believe that the gods of ancient Egypt were extraterrestrials who created our civilization, you should read the book by the same name by authors Pincknett and Prince. The Order of the Solar Temple also expected to be reborn near Sirius...

The Golden Fleece: Many PoS texts refer to the voyage of the Argonauts, in search of the fabled Golden Fleece. As is well known, the Argonauts sailed to Colchis in Asia Minor, or Anatolia. Anatolia is home of one of the earliest human civilizations (Catal Huyuk), Mount Ararat (said to be the mountain of Noah, but it is also the home of the Urartian or Armenian people), the Taurus Mountains, and the land of Galatia or Galatea. This was a part of Asia Minor conquered by the Gaul or Gaelic peoples in the 3rd century BCE, after they went and sacked the oracles of Greece. One of Plantard's orders was known as "Alpha Galates," the origin from the land of the Galates. In alchemy, the Golden Fleece sometimes symbolizes the Philosopher's Stone.

The Cross of Lorraine: In the 1940s, Charles de Gaulle made the Cross of Lorraine the official symbol of the Maquis or French Resistance. It's not clear why, since this symbol was previously associated with the Alsace-Lorraine region, which had only become part of France in the last 200 years, and it was also associated with the Guise-Lorraine families who made a failed "bid" for the monarchy in the 17th century. The double-armed Cross of Lorraine appears to incorporate phi, the Golden Ratio, in its structure. The PoS also seems to consider it "their " symbol. Interestingly, it also seems to resemble the "Jacob's staff" of medieval Jewish philosopher Levi ben Gerson, used to determine longitude through observation of the moon.

Et in Arcadia Ego: "Even in Arcadia, I amÖ" According to art historian Panofsky, this is an elegiac motto, proclaiming that even in the paradisial realm of Arcadia death still exists. Hence, the shock of Poussin's shepherds discovering the tomb of a shepherdess in the midst of their pastoral paradise. However, he was not the first to use the motto in his art: it appears in a 1502 poem by Jacopo Sannzaro, and in an earlier painting by Guercino. Poussin's first version of Shepherds dates from 1620, and the second from 1650: both have the inscription "Et in Arcadia Ego" on the tomb.

There is a monument known as The Shepherds' Monument near Shugborough Hall which contains a version of the 2nd Poussin painting, but reversed, with an inscription underneath that appears to be an acrostic for a line of poetry from poetess Anna Seward of Lichfield. Shugborough Hall was the work of Lord Admiral Anson, a "corsair" and James "the Athenian" Stuart, but the artist who specifically created this monument was a Dutchman known as Scheemakers. When Anson died, a eulogy was read for him in Parliament which mentions "reason's finger pointing at the tomb." Henry Lincoln claims that Shugborough Hall had a copy of both the Poussin painting, and St. Anthony and St. Paul in the Desert by Teniers, mislabeled as Elijah and Elisha Fed by Ravens near Mount Carmel. (This is the only painting by Teniers which does not show St. Anthony being tempted.)

Arcadia, the place in Greece thought to be the home of the oldest antideluvian races, was also associated in medieval iconography and symbolism with the "underground stream" Alphaeus, which was said to flow all the way to Sicily. According to the "prieure documents," the Benjaminites, who were ancestors of the Merovingians, fled to the Arcadia region of Greece, and later migrated to Europe, becoming one of the ancestral origins of the Salian Franks. Rene D'Anjou did a great deal to promote the romantic idea of Arcadia and it turns up in much of his work, as well as Renaissance poems and songs.

The original name of Nova Scotia was Arcadia, but the r was dropped to shorten it to "Acadie". It is from Acadie that the "Cajuns" of Louisiana are from, who sing the old folk song "Good King Dagobert". Some authors claim that Prince Henry Sinclair sailed to A(r)cadia in the 14th century, and may have even brought the Grail with him, leaving it in Oak Island. The blue lotus or waterlily, the stargate of the Egyptians, also grows in Arcadia National Forest.

The Meridian: Many of the PoS texts deal with the Paris Meridian, and hint that the line created by Colbert, Cassini, and Arago, passing through the Paris Observatory, is really an "impostor" - France already had a "hermetic" or hidden meridian, possibly dating back thousands of years. It seems that the very PoSish site of Saint-Sulpice is on the line of the old meridian or "roseline", as hinted at by Le Serpent Rouge, subtiled Notes on Saint Sulpice and Saint Germain de Pres. By moving the line, Cassini and company threw an ancient system out of whack.

One strange discovery I have found is that a similar episode appears to have occurred in the American capitol of Washington, DC. Apparently, DC was originally designed so that 16th street would be its original north-south meridian -- and this meridian was going to be the "zero meridian" of the United States. After Greenwich was made the international meridian, DC and Paris both renounced their claims. Today, DC uses Capitol Street as its N-S axis, but certain monuments, especially those in Meridian Hill Park, point to the older axis. On 16th street, one also finds the home of the Scottish Rite Temple and several esoteric churches and monuments.

The Rose: Rosicrucianism, the Rosy Cross, and rose-line symbolism is all over the place in this mystery. In Sauniere's church, St. Germaine de Pribrac releases a bevy of roses from her apron. The "Fleury Mural" seems to show a rose-filled flowery landscape, associated with the Fleury family. Go to Rodez, and you will find a rose-colored cathedral with rose windows emblazoned with the Star of David. In the Middle Ages, the rose was a symbol of esotericism - sub rosa means to do something in secret. The Templars' cross pattee was a red or rose cross.

How interesting, then, to discover, as I have recently, that the name of several places in France - Rhedae/Rennes, Rouen/Rhodom, Rodez/Rhodes, are derived from the Greek Island of Rhodes, whose name itself comes from the rose-goddess Rhoda. Contemporary texts say that the red-haired Celtic "Redones" or "rose people" (Rutheni/Rhodanim) setlled both Rennes in the Midi and Rennes in Brittany - the name derives from the ethnic group. It is said that the resident goddess of Mount Sion-Vaudemont, the "other Sion" of the "priory of Sion" in Switzerland, is Rosemertha - the Rose mother. Interestingly, one interpretation of the King Arthur legends is that "Arthur" or "Ursus" was really Riothamus, a Dark Age Celt ruler of a "thalassocracy" that spanned Brittany in France and Cornwall in England. Many of the places near Breton Rennes are associated with Arthur and the Grail legends, and many of the Breton kings had Judaic names. And some derive Riothamus' name from... Joseph of Arimathea, the supposed bearer of the Grail to Glastonbury.

Rosslyn Chapel: As with many other aspects of this mystery, the importance of Rosslyn Chapel is unclear and seems to have been obfuscated, unfortunately. Its owners, the Sinclairs, claim to be the hereditary patrons of Scottish Freemasonry, to have explored the New World (particularly Nova Scotia and Oak Island) a century before Colombus, and to be connected to the Templars through marriage and descent. Some of this appears to be in doubt, because it's based on the work of Jacobite historian Father Hay, who used documents that were lost in a fire... in any case, we do know William Sinclair did build Rosslyn in the 1400s, it does contain very unusual carvings (particularly people who look like Templars engaging in things that seem like Masonic rituals), and it does incorporate unusual geometry. (SOME say that this geometry replicates the Temple of Solomon.) Pierre Plantard seems to have changed his name to "de St-Clair" in order to claim affiliation with the Sinclairs of Scotland.

Rosslyn, Gisors, Rennes-les-Chateau, Rennes-les-Bains, and Mont St. Michel are some places mentioned in the documents by name. Stenay (Satanicum) was Dagobert II's capitol, and the current home of Le Cercle Dagobert. Guidebooks suggest it is infamous for falling frogs. Mont St. Michel, according to the "prieure documents," was where "Et in Arcadia Ego" was first uttered, by Abbot Robert de Torigny in 1210. Author John Michell claims a "St. Michael Ley" runs between Mont St. Michel and St. Michael's Mount in Cornwall. St. Michael's Mount is surrounded by the sea but the "Atlantis" legends of Ys and Lyonesse claim that it is sitting in a place where there was once dry land, which has now become submerged.

The Sacred Heart: Thanks to Mary-Margaret Alacoque, the Sacred Heart of Jesus seems to have become a curiously nationalistic symbol in France (like that of the Chevalier Bayard), connected with the church and the monarchy. It also became a central symbol for esotericists like Guenon. Guy Patton argues that the Sacred Heart cultus in France is deeply associated with the PoS, which he sees as a largely Catholic Traditionalist society, opposed (as many Sacred Heart believers were) to modernism and liberal democracy. Paul Smith, another researcher, thinks that Sauniere was primarily involved in covert efforts to turn the Sacre-Coeur Basilica of Paris into a rallying point for a restored Catholic monarchy. However, the Sacred Heart is a multi-valent symbol, and there are those that argue that for the PoS, the Sacred Heart they venerate is that of Mary Magdalene, not Jesus.

The Prieure Documents: In order to pierce the veil surrounding the mysteries of this group, it is necessary to pore over some of the esoteric texts they have hidden away in the Biblioteque Nationnale. Some of these documents are central to the mystery:

* Henri Boudet, Le Vraie Langue Celtique et le Cromlech de Rennes-les-Baines
* Philippe de Cherisey, Circuit. (a 1968 fictional novel).
* "Henri Lobineau," Les Dossiers Secretes.
* Eugene Stublein, "Pierres gravees du Languedoc" (it is thought that Stublein never wrote this in 1884 - it contains the Marie de Negre tomb inscription)
* Gaston de Koker, Pierre Feugere, and Louis Saint-Maxent, Le Serpent Rouge
* Jean DeLaude, Le Cercle D'Ulysee
* Antoine L'Ermite, Un Tresor Merovingian a Rennes-les-Chateau
* Pierre Jarnac, Melanges Sulfureux

Three authors who appear to have been "prieure spokesmen" were Gerard de Sede, Jean-Luc Chaumeil, and Louis Vazart. The journalist duo of Jean-Pierre Deloux and Louis Bretigny have also written "PoS" articles. Unfortunately, much of this material has not been translated from the French. Chaumeil was a UFO writer and now presents himself as an "expert" on the Order of the Solar Temple. De Sede appears to have been a Surrealist poet. Vazart is one of the leaders of the Cercle Dagobert, a Stenay-based organization that commemorates Dagobert II and his "progeny". Deloux is a writer on detective fiction, having written several essays on Raymond Chandler for POLAR magazine. Philippe De Cherisey was a Belgian TV-actor who appeared in several TV series and made-for-TV films. No one knows who "Lobineau" was although some think he was either Jewish antiquarian Leo Schidlof or the Count Henri de Lenoncourt. Koker, Feugere, and Saint-Maxent probably did NOT write the Red Serpent; it seems like their names were fished out of the obituaries because they had the misfortune to all die on the same day.

Sion: It's not clear which Sion the Priory of Sion takes its name from: Mt. Sion in Jerusalem, or Mt. Sion in Switzerland. In 1956, the PoS registered itself at Annemasse, not too far from Sion, Switzerland. Many of the first "prieure documents" seem to have been released through the Swiss Grand Loge Alpina (GLA). The full name of the group, according to its statutes, is the Priory of Our Lady of Zion, or "Sionis Prioratus", with the subtitle CIRCUIT, which is said to stand for Chivalry of Catholic Rules and Institutions of the Independent and Traditionalist Union. In the 19th century, Sion-Vaudemont was the site of an unusual series of events: a restoration effort of the Catholic shrines on the mountain by the Brothers Baillard was "derailed" by the Church, only to be resumed by a Norman Johannite mystic named Michel "Elias the Prophet" Vintras whose Church of Carmel preached the Joachmite dispensation and said the Magdalene would be the Mediatrix of the New Age.

The Angelic Society: Three recent French books, Jules Verne: Initiate and Initiator by Michael Lamy, Arsene Lupin: Unknown Master by Patrick Ferte, and Fulcanelli and the Black Cat by Richard Khaitzine, seem to suggest that the PoS came into being as a sort of artistic society, uniting the Bohemian avant-garde artists of Montmartre (the Symbolists, the Surrealists, and the Romantics). Apparently, these musicians, writer-poets, dramatists, and painters were interested in common themes, and in the Rabelaisian technique of using Grasset D'Orcet's "language of the birds"... creating puns, rebuses, and riddles for the purposes of satire, social criticism, and concealing knowledge. In the works of disparate creative people such as Honore de Balzac, Maurice Leblanc, Jules Verne, Raymond Roussel, Erik Satie, Pablo Picasso, Max Jacob, Valentine Gross Hugo, Marc Chagall, Gerard de Nerval, Maurice Barres, Josephin Peladan, Claude Debussy and "Les Six," Comte Robert de Montesquiou, Victor Hugo, Jean Cocteau, Charles Nodier, Stephane Mallarme, Maurice Maeterlinck, Jean-Julian Champagne (Fulcanelli), and perhaps even Pataphysician Alfred Jarry, can be found the techniques and interests we today associate with the "Priory of Sion". Lamy says that many of these people belonged to a group he calls The Brouillards (The Clouds) or the Angelic Society, of which the PoS is a modern manifestation. They are descended from the Gouliards, or medieval clerks and print-makers, whose mystical and heretical Cathar watermarks so fascinated Harold Bayley. Robert Anton Wilson also feels that a number of these people may have also belonged to the Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor.

Some interesting facts: Balzac's Unknown Masterpiece is about a secret known to only two painters, Poussin and Pourbus; and appears to have been the inspiration for an occult masterpiece by Picasso. "Croise" Andre Malraux appears to have been part of an aerial expedition to discover the palace of the Queen of Sheba in Yemen, a feat which he was congratulated for by Haile Selassie of Ethiopia; as Minister of Cultural Affairs, he helped organize an archaeological expedition to Gisors in 1964. Leblanc's work The Triangle of Gold has the same name as a "prieure document" created by Jean-Luc Chaumeil in 1979. Satie left a strange note behind saying he was part of a society descended from the Knights Templar and the Protectors of the Holy Sepulchre. Barres' most famous work is La Colline Inspiree, about Sion-Vaudemont and the Baillard Brothers. In one of de Nerval's works, he said that he saw a star rising from the sea, and written on it was the name "Merovee".

Surrealism and the Oulipo

Increasingly, I am finding more evidence of Surrealists at work in this mystery. Henry Lincoln first pointed out that Cocteau's Mural in Notre Dame de France seems to have a pentagram centered on Cocteau's forehead. My research suggests that this pentagram is a reference to Cocteau's surrealist colleagues, Guillaume Apollinaire, who had a star-shaped wound on his head, and Raymond Roussel, who wrote a play, The Star in the Forehead. The Mural also contains a Blue Rose, which is an apparent allusion to a Russian Symbolist art group that influenced Marc Chagall and other painters. According to Simon Miles, the Surrealist poem Le Serpent Rouge contains symbolism from Jung's _Mysterium Coniunctionis_, which was of key interest to Surrealists. Most importantly, Gerard de Sede in the 1940s belonged to two Surrealist groups, Les Reverberes and La Main a Plume. Members of these groups would go on later to form the Workshop for Potential Literature (Oulipo) in the 1960s. Oulipo was interested in cryptograms, ciphers, textual reversals and inversions, geometric figures in paintings (Oupeinpo), and one key Oulipo text even used the Knight's Tour of the Chessboard as a organizing device. Jean-Pierre Deloux seems to be connected to Oupolipo, the offshoot of Oulipo devoted to creating detective police fictions. And Philippe de Cherisey seems to have written several articles on Alfred Jarry, the founder of the Surrealist College de Pataphysique.

Dossiers Secrets

Les Dossiers Secrets

"Tahap dua" dari kehidupan Biarawan dimulai pada Januari 1964. Metode penyampaian sangat berbeda: metode baru deposisi dokumen di Bibliothèque Nationale, di Paris, yang hanya akan membaca dan dibahas selama lima sampai sepuluh tahun. Tujuan dari latihan karena itu jangka panjang, dan berbeda dari tahap sebelumnya; Vaincre dan Sirkuit yang bebas didistribusikan dalam publikasi massa; Les Dossiers Secrets, nama yang diberikan untuk serangkaian dokumen yang disimpan di perpustakaan, ada satu eksemplar, tanpa pembaca langsung dalam pikiran. Tujuannya, karenanya, bukan perputaran cepat atau akibat langsung.

Dokumen pertama diendapkan pada Januari 1964, tetapi tanggal "Jenewa, 1956". The (palsu) tanggal ini tentu saja tahun Biarawan resmi terdaftar; Jenewa di Swiss, tepat di seberang perbatasan dari Annemasse, Plantard rumah pada saat itu. Dokumen ini berjudul "Genealogie mérovingiens et des Rois de Diverses origine et familles françaises étrangères de souche mérovingienne" dan dibahas raja Merovingian dan bagaimana darah mereka terus hadir di keluarga Perancis tertentu.
Untuk peneliti Perancis René Descadeillas, dokumen-dokumen yang ditulis oleh seseorang yang keduanya fasih berbahasa Perancis dan Jerman, tetapi ia menyarankan gaya Jerman. Descadeillas percaya penulis untuk Swiss. Penulis terdaftar sebagai "Henri Lobineau" dan mengaku tinggal di Jenewa. Meskipun tidak ada orang tersebut ada dan alamat Jenewa itu palsu, itu tidak menyarankan kita mencari orang Jerman-Swiss sebagai pengarang dokumen ini. Jika demikian, ini tidak termasuk dua tersangka yang sering diidentifikasi sebagai Biarawan di belakang "lelucon": Plantard sendiri, dan asisten Philippe de Cherisey, seorang Belgia Perancis.

Sambungan Swiss akan muncul kembali waktu dan lagi: dalam berkas membuat beberapa referensi ke Swiss dan sesekali, salinan dari dokumen-dokumen yang diposting ke peneliti dari Jenewa. Jadi, meskipun berbicara tentang Perancis, dasar sejati "Les Dossiers Secrets" - Biarawan Sion? - Seakan-akan Swiss, kemungkinan besar Jenewa atau daerah sekitarnya. Untuk saat ini, kami hanya akan dicatat bahwa sambungan Swiss Perancis-ada sejak tahun 1952, diciptakan oleh Plantard, yang tinggal di kedua negara dan sepertinya untuk membiayai perancis de Gaulle kampanye dengan uang Swiss - yaitu uang perancis diekspor ke Swiss.

File kedua

Deposisi yang kedua terjadi pada bulan Agustus 1965, yang berjudul "Les keturunan mérovingiens du ou l'énigme Razes wisigoth", ditulis oleh Madeleine Blancasall. Nama penulis sekali lagi nama samaran, nama keluarga diambil dari sungai Blanques dan Sals, yang mengalir melalui Rennes-les-Bains. Seperti judulnya, subjek adalah keturunan Merovingian sekali lagi, kali ini menghubungkannya dengan "sebuah" misteri di Razes - wilayah Rennes-les-Bains, dan tentu saja tetangga Rennes-le-Château.
Dokumen menyatakan bahwa itu diterjemahkan dari bahasa Jerman oleh satu Walter Celse-Nazaire, nama samaran lain, kali ini diambil dari orang-orang kudus pelindung gereja Rennes-les-Bains. Sekali lagi, kita perhatikan sudut bahasa Jerman hadir. Menariknya, dokumen negara - berpura-pura - bahwa tujuan penggunaannya secara eksklusif untuk "Suisse Asosiasi Alpina", yang merupakan Grand Lodge Alpina, Swiss Freemasonik grup peraturan. Secara singkat, dokumen berpura-pura untuk penggunaan Freemason Swiss. Disetorkan dari dua dokumen, keduanya terutama Swiss fokus.

Cerita

Kedua dokumen menenun misteri Berenger Sauniere menjadi kerangka Merovingian. Pada tahun 1964, misteri Rennes-le-Château dikenal di Perancis - meskipun jauh dari skala diketahui saat ini. Pada waktu itu, tidak ada menyebutkan Merovingian. Bahwa dimensi yang asli dan muncul melalui Dossiers Secrets. Dokumen kedua misalnya mengklaim bahwa rahasia hidup Merovingian dikenal dan dijaga oleh keluarga Hautpoul Rennes-le-Chateau, yang telah mempercayakan rahasia ini untuk Bigou, imam desa pada tahun 1781.
Namun, kembalinya Merovingian raja untuk memerintah Perancis tidak asli Dossiers Secrets. Para peneliti telah menemukan bahwa Simone de Beauvoir menulis tentang suatu peristiwa yang terjadi pada tahun 1934 dan yang melibatkan Lionel de Roulet: "Sementara Sartre sedang pergi aku memberikan pelajaran filsafat untuk Lionel de Roulet, yang sekarang tinggal di Paris. Dia dan beberapa teman telah mendirikan apa yang disebut Partai Merovingian, yang menganjurkan, dengan menggunakan poster dan pamflet, kembalinya keturunan Chilperic takhta. "
Banyak orang bisa jadi tahu tentang de Roulet minat. Tepat tiga dekade telah berlalu sejak tahun 1934 ciptaan-Nya dan deposisi dokumen pertama pada tahun 1964. Kami menambahkan bahwa kedua kelompok menggunakan metode yang sama (pamflet).

Langkah ketiga

Dokumen ketiga diendapkan Mei 1966, yang ditandatangani oleh Antoine l'Ermite - nama samaran yang jelas, diambil dari santo yang populer. Ini adalah halaman sembilan pamflet, faksimili dari sebuah bab dari buku oleh Robert Charroux, Perancis jawaban untuk von Daniken - meskipun ia mendahului Swiss pengarang dengan lebih dari satu dekade. Teks dari buku dan salinan cocok, kecuali dua perubahan kecil.
Charroux telah menjadi salah satu orang pertama yang menulis tentang misteri Rennes-le-Château dan dokumen itu sendiri berfokus pada pada Hautpoul kehendak keluarga, yang setahun sebelumnya telah diidentifikasi sebagai pelindung rahasia Merovingian. Penulis menulis: "Pada tahun 1961, mereka [wasiat] yang diberikan kepada Yusuf Alpina oleh Abbé Courtaly dari Villarzel-du-Razes".
Kita perhatikan bahwa Alpina adalah Freemason Swiss, yang pura-pura target dokumen kedua. Tanggal kunci tampaknya 1961, postdating Biarawan 1956, tetapi mendahului deposisi pertama. Tokoh utama adalah Courtaly, yang merupakan teman dikenal Sauniere, yang membantunya cat relief altar gereja Rennes-le-Chateau, yang menampilkan Maria Magdalena berdoa di sebuah gua.

Dimensi baru

Courtaly adalah dimensi yang sebagian besar tidak diketahui dalam misteri Rennes-le-Château. Meskipun ia adalah unsur yang diketahui, ia telah menerima sedikit atau tidak ada perhatian - kecuali dalam Dossiers Secrets. Ia hidup lebih lama Sauniere oleh setengah abad (Sauniere meninggal tahun 1917) dan Marie Dénarnaud, Sauniere pembantu, dengan satu dekade. Dia adalah seorang pemain dalam misteri asli Sauniere, tetapi, sebagaimana disebutkan, sering ditinggalkan dari persamaan.
Kebanyakan Menariknya, kita tahu bahwa Courtaly bertemu Plantard, sebagai Courtauly mengambil air di Rennes-les-Bains berikut pensiun pada tahun 1961. Dia datang ke kota spa antara 1961 dan 1964 dan diketahui telah bertemu Plantard sana, yang sering mengunjungi spa di masa itu. Courtaly meninggal pada bulan November 1964, antara saat ketika pertama dan kedua file tersebut disimpan di Bibliothèque Nationale.

Keempat Cicilan

Dokumen keempat tanggal dari bulan November 1966 dan merupakan suatu tambahan ke file pertama. Penulis sebagai salah satu "S. Roux", daftar dokumen pernyataan yang dibuat oleh salah satu Burrus Lionel. Dokumen ini jelas dibuat untuk "kebocoran" yang "identitas sejati" dari Lobineau, yang pseudonim penulis dokumen pertama. Kita perhatikan bahwa para peneliti percaya bahwa orang ini menjadi Swiss, dan berbahasa Jerman.
Salinan dokumen ini tidak hanya disetorkan, tapi dikirim ke beberapa peneliti, termasuk Descadeillas, cap pos Jenewa, di mana Burrus 'keluarga menonjol. Tapi ... Burrus telah meninggal dalam kecelakaan mobil di usia 20, pada bulan September 1966 - dua bulan sebelum dokumen muncul. Entah kebenaran sekarang bisa diberitahu, atau seseorang yang memastikan bahwa cerita ini tidak akan pernah bisa diverifikasi - dan itu berarti cerita itu bohong.
Burrus mengaku mewakili Swiss Pemuda Kristen dan mengungkapkan bahwa Lobineau Leo R. Schidlof, yang baru saja meninggal di Wina, pada 17 Oktober 1966, 19 hari sebelum dokumen itu ditempatkan di Bibliothèque. Schidlof adalah seorang ahli miniatur dan dengan demikian otoritas di bidangnya. Dia tinggal di London antara tahun 1948 dan 1966 dan meninggal dalam perjalanan ke Wina - umur 80. Jadi, singkatnya, dokumen ini ditulis oleh orang baru meninggal dua orang, yang dokumen klaim, berada di pusat dari seluruh misteri.

Sekali lagi, ada referensi khusus kepada Hautpoul silsilah, tetapi kali ini dengan skenario yang berbeda. "Roux" menyatakan bahwa salah satu Fatin Marius memberikan silsilah dari Hautpouls ke Liga Internasional Penjual buku antik. Kami perhatikan bahwa di file sebelumnya, ia mengklaim bahwa Courtaly memiliki dokumen-dokumen dan memberikannya kepada Freemason Swiss. Yang Fatin? Dia adalah pemilik kastil Rennes-le-Chateau sejak 1946. Rennes penggemar dicatat bahwa Fatin sepertinya tidak akan terlibat dalam salah satu kegilaan yang berlangsung, meskipun orang lain telah menyatakan bahwa Fatin adalah teman de Gaulle, rupanya tahunan menerima kartu pos darinya (tetapi kemudian orang-orang seperti de Gaulle mengirimkan ribuan ini keluar), dan juga menggambarkan dirinya sebagai seorang arkeolog dan seorang pejabat tinggi freemason. Marilah kita hanya dicatat bahwa kedua skenario tentang silsilah Hautpoul diajukan.

Nomor 5 - dan 6

Dokumen kelima adalah puisi terkenal Ular Merah, dengan cap 20 Maret 1967, tetapi tanggal 15 Februari 1967. Mendahului ini penting, untuk tiga penulis terdaftar sebagai Feugère Pierre, Saint-Louis Maxent dan Gaston de Koker. Ketiganya adalah orang-orang yang nyata, tetapi semua meninggal antara Februari 15 dan tanggal 20 Maret. Penulis sesungguhnya membuatnya tampak seolah-olah ketiga penulis dibunuh atau melakukan bunuh diri setelah mereka menulis puisi ini. Sebenarnya, mungkin penulis untuk mencari berita kematian bunuh diri, dan menemukan tiga orang ini, dengan menggunakan nama-nama mereka sebagai "penulis".

Keenam dan terakhir dokumen dalam seri ini disebut "Les Dossiers secrets de Henri Lobineau" dan tidak hanya memberikan namanya menjadi seri, tapi kembali ke penulis asli, Lobineau. Saat itu disimpan di perpustakaan pada bulan April 1967. Ini berarti enam dokumen diendapkan selama periode 39 bulan, antara Januari 1964 dan April 1967.

Dokumen mencakup surat, tanggal 2 Juli 1966, untuk Marius Fatin, dari dugaan orang-orang yang menjual kehendak Pierre Francois d'Hautpoul ke Liga Internasional Penjual buku antik - dan dengan demikian kembali ke inti dari dokumen 4. Namun demikian, sekarang menyediakan kemungkinan ketiga mengenai apa yang terjadi dengan silsilah, mengklaim bahwa perkamen telah dijarah dari Hoffet's perpustakaan setelah kematiannya pada tahun 1946 dan disahkan oleh penipuan pada 1948 ke Liga, berakhir di arsip rahasia Order Malta.
Penulis dokumen sekarang terdaftar sebagai Toscan Philippe du Plantier, benar-benar orang yang masih hidup pada waktu itu - dan siapa yang membuat berita utama. Dia telah ditangkap karena kepemilikan LSD pada 11 April 1967, 16 hari sebelum deposisi file di perpustakaan nasional - sekali lagi, yang sebenarnya telah mengangkat nama-nama penulis dari rekening koran, untuk menciptakan sebuah kerangka kerja palsu terhadap dokumen-dokumen yang dicat. Untuk pertama kalinya - dan untuk dokumen akhir - yang "mengklaim penulis" masih hidup, meskipun sama sekali tidak berhubungan dengan apa yang sedang terjadi.
Tujuan?

"Apa ini maksudnya? Dokumen-dokumen apa yang ingin dicapai? Kita harus mencatat bahwa deposisi ini mendahului publikasi, pada bulan November 1967, dari Gerard de Sede buku tentang Rennes-le-Château: "L'Or de Rennes, ou la vie insolite de Berenger Sauniere". Buku ini benar-benar didedikasikan untuk Courtaly, rekan Sauniere, yang kita bisa melacak sebagai sumber sejati dan de Sede Plantard minat dalam kisah Sauniere.
Dalam "Le vrai Dossier de l'énigme de Rennes. Réponse à M. Descadeillas ", Gerard de Sede memulai membalas kritik dengan menunjukkan bahwa ia tidak memulai penelitian tidak pada 1965, sebagai Descadeillas menuduh, tetapi pada tahun 1962. De Sede menulis:" Kenapa membuat seperti parodi dari fakta-fakta ? Hanya dengan menyindir bahwa saya tahu apa-apa tentang negara, bahwa saya telah menulis buku saya dalam dua tahun dan terutama - terutama - bahwa aku tidak bisa tahu dan berbicara dengan orang-orang tertentu yang saksi dan agen dalam urusan - dan tidak sedikit - yang masih hidup pada tahun 1962, tetapi yang, karena usia tua, mati pada tahun 1965. "
Ini "saksi" adalah tidak lain dari Courtaly - tetapi yang juga digambarkan sebagai "agen". Kemudian, de Sede mengulangi cerita yang muncul dalam buku pertamanya, di mana ia melakukan wawancara dengan Courtaly. Courtaly, dalam wawancara itu, menyatakan bahwa Sauniere menemukan sebuah harta karun, dan bahwa Sauniere memberinya bagian dari ini, yang Visigothic dan Merovingian keping uang. Courtaly menunjukkan ini kepada de Sede.

Apa, kemudian, adalah tujuan dari deposisi di Bibliothèque Nationale dokumen-dokumen ini? Menurut pendapat saya, dokumen-dokumen yang dimaksudkan untuk disimpan di perpustakaan sebelum penerbitan buku. Mereka adalah "persiapan", sehingga setelah buku ini diterbitkan, hal-hal lain dapat digerakkan.
Kita harus mencatat bahwa Plantard de Sede tahu, karena kedua telah bekerjasama pada tahun 1961 untuk penerbitan buku tentang Gisors. Kita tahu bahwa mereka berdua tahu, berbicara dan mewawancarai Courtaly. Menurut sejumlah peneliti, Plantard juga untuk menerima de Sede persentase pendapatan dari edisi pertama buku ini, menunjukkan bahwa Plantard itu setidaknya erat terlibat dengan penciptaan buku ini, kalau tidak salah satu dari rekan-rekan penulis.

Potongan puzzle

Beberapa potongan kronologis cocok dan memungkinkan kita untuk membuat skenario teoretis. Setelah tahun 1958, Plantard diketahui telah datang ke daerah Rennes-le-Château dan Rennes-les-Bains. Pada 1961, ia bekerja sama dengan de Sede di sebuah buku tentang Templar kemungkinan harta di Gisors. Antara 1961 dan 1964, Plantard berbicara kepada Courtaly. Dan di sinilah kita mulai mengekstrapolasi: Plantard de Sede berbicara tentang sebuah buku baru, pada sebuah misteri baru, yaitu Rennes-le-Château. Courtaly De Sede wawancara untuk buku, sehingga mereka dapat mengutip dia. Courtaly mati. Selama beberapa tahun berikutnya, Les Dossiers Secrets yang disimpan di perpustakaan nasional, kurang lebih bertepatan dengan jangka waktu di mana de Sede tangan dalam naskah dan buku ini diterbitkan. Buku ini kemudian didedikasikan untuk Courtaly, karena ia adalah sumber utama informasi untuk buku tersebut.

False perkamen

Sedangkan Dossiers Secret berbicara tentang perkamen, yaitu dari Hautpoul silsilah keluarga, yang dihubungkan dengan kehadiran keturunan Merovingian di Perancis, de Sede berbicara tentang dua perkamen lain, yang telah menjadi sangat terkenal karena - sebenarnya, juga terkenal.
Ini adalah dua teks Latin, salinan dari bagian-bagian dari Injil, yang adalah orang-orang percaya untuk ditemukan oleh Sauniere - dixit de Sede. Lima tahun setelah penerbitan buku de Sede, seorang aktor Inggris-penulis Henry Lincoln de Sede membaca buku dan rupanya mampu menyadari bahwa perkamen memasukkan serangkaian sandi. Ketika ia dihadapkan de Sede dengan penalaran, de Sede menyatakan bahwa ia tahu bahwa perkamen berisi sandi dan dua bersama-sama terus menjelaskan ke seluruh dunia yang menyenangkan ini - belum benar-benar mengarang - wahyu: bahwa perkamen di jantung misteri berisi pesan rahasia.

Tanpa terlalu banyak detail, sebuah sandi yang ada untuk melindungi sebuah pesan inti. "Tuo kool" adalah omong kosong seperti itu, tetapi ketika kita membacanya terbalik, itu berbunyi "Awas". Kunci dengan demikian akan mundur untuk membaca pesan. Itulah yang cipher adalah: pesan yang sulit dipahami adalah berbalik, melalui penerapan kunci, menjadi pesan yang bermakna, tanpa orang-orang yang tidak memiliki kunci tidak menyadari apa pesan berarti.
Dalam kasus perkamen, pengkodean itu lima kali lipat, menggunakan rangkaian dua teknik, yang disebut Vigenere Square dan Knight's Tour. Kata kunci tidak kurang dari 128 surat-surat lama, dan merupakan prasasti batu nisan Marie de Negre (di pemakaman Rennes-le-Château). Hasil dari penerapan kode kunci untuk memberikan pesan yang dalam sendiri merupakan serangkaian teka-teki referensi untuk "Dagobert II", yang kita tidak akan masuk ke dalam. Singkatnya, "pesan diterjemahkan" tidak jelas sama sekali dan menyediakan lebih banyak pertanyaan daripada jawaban. Ahli juga menyatakan bahwa pesan itu sendiri adalah sia-sia potongan bahan yang akan diterjemahkan, karena teknik dan kunci yang terlibat berarti bahwa penerima harus sudah tahu pesan bahwa ia akan men-decode - membuat seluruh latihan sia-sia, mengemis pertanyaan mengapa hal itu dikirim dalam tempat pertama. Para ahli juga menyatakan bahwa mekanisme yang digunakan dalam cipher ini tidak berguna, karena hanya mampu memecahkan kode pesan tunggal ini.

Expert coders

Tapi itu tidak semua. De Sede menyatakan ia tidak menciptakan dokumen ini. De Sede ditemukan, sebelum Lincoln tiba, bahwa perkamen bahwa dia telah menunjukkan dalam bukunya berisi sandi. De Sede decodation mengklaim bahwa telah diberikan kepadanya oleh seorang ahli pemecah kode di militer. Tapi pakar pemecah kode menjelaskan bahwa hal ini sangat tidak mungkin. Untuk satu, metode yang begitu kompleks dan memerlukan pengetahuan khusus tertentu, bahwa kode hampir terpecahkan. Lebih jauh lagi, menurut pendapat saya, bahkan jika seorang ahli pemecah kode bisa datang dengan decodation yang mengarah ke penuh teka-teki "pesan diterjemahkan", ia akan berpikir ia telah salah suatu tempat, sebagai hasil akhir tetap tidak masuk akal, mengusulkan cipher lebih lanjut perlu diterapkan, atau metode yang digunakan dan kunci yang salah.
Bagaimana mungkin bahwa Lincoln memecahkan pesan pertanyaan kunci dimana beberapa orang telah bertanya, walaupun jelas bahwa de Sede buku yang disediakan semua petunjuk dan bahan yang diperlukan. Hal itu sendiri adalah sebuah kebetulan yang menarik ... Secara singkat, hal ini sangat tidak mungkin bahwa De Sede tak mungkin tahu tentang sandi ketika ia meletakkan semua bagian dari teka-teki dalam bukunya.

Pilar di mana perkamen diduga ditemukan

Jadi: di sini kita punya perkamen, yang de Sede klaim yang asli, yang diduga ditemukan Sauniere, yang mengandung sebuah sandi, yang entah bagaimana hanya "terjadi" untuk berbicara tentang kehilangan Merovingian. Lincoln akan terus untuk menulis "Holy Blood, Holy Grail". Buku adalah sebuah grosir buy-in dari klaim Plantard, yang antara 1972 dan 1982 (tanggal publikasi) akan terus memainkan "keturunan Merovingian" kartu. Lincoln dan co. membeli ini - dan menambahkan Yesus dan Maria Magdalena elemen campuran - karena "penguraian".
Jadi: di satu sisi, Merovingian dan dokumen mengenai Rennes-le-Château ditempatkan di Bibliothèque. Di sisi lain, buku ini ditulis tentang Rennes-le-Château yang membahas beberapa dokumen, tapi pada awalnya tidak mendukung mereka. Ini adalah masalah catatan bahwa garis Merovingian adalah bagian kecil dari buku De Sede. Namun demikian, buku ini berisi dua perkamen yang kemudian diterjemahkan dan - secara ajaib - berbicara tentang sambungan Merovingian. Tapi kita kemudian mencari tahu De Sede sudah menyadari hal ini "pesan berkode" sebelum Lincoln tiba di lokasi, dan ketika diminta untuk menjelaskan bagaimana ia tahu, ia mengklaim "codebreakers militer" membantunya.

Benar asal usul?

Kemudian, de Cherisey akan keadaan - beberapa berpendapat dia "mengakui" - bahwa dia-lah yang menciptakan perkamen dan kemudian menciptakan penyandian. Meskipun menurut pendapat saya perkamen itu direkayasa sebagai bagian dari "Dossiers Secrets" latihan dan tidak sengaja disimpan di perpustakaan, tetapi dimasukkan dalam De Sede publikasi, saya tidak percaya bahwa de Cherisey merupakan satu-satunya pencipta mereka - meskipun ia mungkin benar-benar telah dilibatkan, misalnya dia mungkin "meminta" dokumen-dokumen ini harus bohong.
Mengapa saya tidak menerima de Cherisey grosir? Cipher dan metodologi yang digunakan menyarankan kita di hadapan seorang ahli pemecah kode. Tidak hanya perkamen perlu dibuat, bahan-bahan lain, seperti kunci, harus dibuat juga.

Ini adalah keyakinan saya bahwa satu orang, atau sekelompok kecil orang yang bekerja bersama-sama, menciptakan semua bahan yang dikenal Dossiers, ditambah sandi. Pekerjaan ini dilakukan pada waktu yang sama ketika De Sede buku, yang membentuk bagian integral dari seluruh "latihan".
Penciptaan Dossiers membawa kita untuk mempertimbangkan orang Jerman-Swiss sebagai penulisnya. Jadi, yang "penulis sebenarnya" materi ini adalah seseorang atau sekelompok orang, yang melibatkan paling tidak satu orang Jerman-Swiss, berpengetahuan dari dan mampu bekerja dengan sandi. Kedua, ia atau mereka memiliki akses ke Plantard dan melalui Plantard untuk de Sede - meskipun tentunya sangat mungkin bahwa de Sede adalah anggota inti grup ini, yang akan kita label "DSC", Dossiers Secrets Coders.

Rumor

Ada banyak bukti - terlalu banyak untuk disebutkan di sini - yang mengarah pada kesimpulan bahwa perkamen palsu. Kami memiliki satu orang, de Cherisey, teman Plantard, yang mengaku telah palsu mereka. Kami tidak memiliki motif yang diketahui, walaupun salah satu anggota lingkaran Plantard, Gino Sandri, mengatakan ini: perkamen itu dibuat sebagai sarana "untuk mengalihkan perhatian untuk melindungi dokumen-dokumen lain". Itu adalah kampanye yang nyata "ditujukan untuk seseorang atau suatu masyarakat yang aktif di bidang gaib" dan dari analisis kami, tampaknya bahwa target yang dimaksud Swiss freemason. Logika akan menunjukkan bahwa dokumen-dokumen yang harus dilindungi adalah genealogic Hautpoul dokumen - atau dokumen yang entah bagaimana terkait dengan dokumen genealogic ini.
Dokumen-dokumen itu adalah satu-satunya dokumen yang masuk akal dalam terang apa Dossiers Secrets mencoba melakukan: mereka menyorot dokumen-dokumen ini, tetapi kemudian dipresentasikan tiga skenario alternatif. Ini menunjukkan bahwa DSC tidak tahu apa yang terjadi pada dokumen, tetapi skenario yang ditawarkan, dengan harapan bahwa seseorang akan baik tampil ke depan dengan informasi tambahan mengenai keberadaan dokumen-dokumen, atau seseorang akan mempunyai cukup pengetahuan atau bukti yang sah sekurang-kurangnya satu skenario. Dengan menghilangkan kemungkinan dan menerima informasi lebih lanjut, seseorang tampaknya berharap dia atau mereka bisa tiba di menemukan nasib dan keberadaan dokumen-dokumen ini.
Sandi itu, muncul di de Sede buku, adalah persis "taktik pengalihan", tetapi juga saham besar di dalam tanah, yang de Sede dan Plantard mungkin telah berharap akan membawa orang keluar dari hutan, mengklaim bahwa sandi tidak nyata dokumen pada inti dari kontroversi.

Sebuah misteri asli
Mari kita tambahkan bahwa ada yang asli dan menarik misteri tentang silsilah Hautpoul ini - lampiran surat wasiat. Silsilah diketahui telah disetor pada tahun 1644 oleh notaris Captier di Esperaza. Setelah kematian Marie de Negre, dia anak perempuan tertua Elisabeth keluarga melarang akses ke dokumen-dokumen keluarga tertentu. Sebelumnya, seorang notaris telah berkonsultasi dengan notarised material dan telah menyatakan ia tidak bersedia untuk kembali dokumen-dokumen ini kepada keluarga, karena betapa pentingnya - dan bahaya, yang kedua sentimen yang sama digunakan oleh Elisabeth dalam argumen mengapa saudara atau siapa lain yang tidak diizinkan untuk memiliki materi keluarga tertentu.

Jika benar, tujuan dari Dossiers Secrets adalah sebuah kampanye, yang melibatkan de Sede publikasi, ditujukan kepada seseorang, diyakini terlibat dalam kelompok rahasia, yaitu Swiss freemason, dan "merokok orang itu keluar", dalam rangka untuk menentukan kebenaran - atau lebih bukti - tentang keberadaan dari dokumen Hautpoul. Kesimpulan ini bertepatan dengan pernyataan yang dibuat oleh Sandri untuk tujuan kampanye, serta bukti-bukti yang tersedia. Saya berpendapat bahwa cerita tentang dokumen-dokumen ini diberitahu oleh Courtaly untuk Plantard dan / atau de Sede, tetapi itu tidak harus tahu Courtaly cukup baik sebelum imam meninggal. Sebagai akibatnya, duet kita tahu sebagian dari kisah pada inti misteri, tetapi tidak semua. Dengan demikian, mereka menemukan metode bagaimana mereka bisa mendapatkan tangan mereka pada dokumen-dokumen yang hilang, atau mengetahui keberadaan mereka yang sesungguhnya. Hal ini melibatkan tiga skenario yang potensial, yang bekerja dalam tiga dokumen rahasia, serta baru "sandi", bekerja ke de Sede buku, yang akan digunakan sebagai sistem alamat publik, berharap bahwa mereka dengan informasi asli akan melakukan kontak dengan penulis. Jika - walaupun saya yakin mereka berharap itu akan menjadi "ketika" - ini terjadi, misi mereka akan tercapai.

Jacques de Molay

Yakobus Molay (Perancis: Jacques de Molay) (c. 1240/1250 - Maret 1314 [1]) adalah tanggal 23 dan terakhir Grand Master dari Ksatria Templar, memimpin Orde dari April 20, 1292 sampai ordo ini dibubarkan oleh perintah Paus Klemens V pada 1312. [2] Meskipun sedikit yang diketahui tentang kehidupan nyata dan perbuatan kecuali tahun-tahun terakhirnya sebagai Grand Master, ia adalah yang paling terkenal Templar, bersama dengan Orde pendiri dan pertama Grand Master, Hugues de Payens ( 1070-1136). Jacques de Molay tujuan sebagai Grand Master adalah untuk mereformasi Ordo, dan menyesuaikan ke situasi di Tanah Suci selama hari-hari memudarnya Perang Salib. Sebagai dukungan Eropa untuk Perang Salib telah menyusut, kekuatan lain sedang bekerja yang berusaha membubarkan Ordo dan mengklaim kekayaan Templar sebagai milik mereka. Raja Philip IV dari Perancis, sangat berhutang kepada para Templar, telah Molay dan banyak lainnya Templar Perancis ditahan di 1307 dan disiksa untuk membuat pengakuan palsu. Ketika Molay kemudian menarik pengakuannya, Philip telah dia dibakar di tiang pancang di sebuah pulau di Seine sungai di Paris, pada bulan Maret 1314. Akhir yang tiba-tiba baik dari berabad-abad urutan berusia Templar, dan eksekusi dramatis dari pemimpin terakhir, berbalik Jacques de Molay menjadi tokoh legendaris. Urutan persaudaraan Freemasonry, yang datang ke menonjol di tahun 1700-an, juga telah ditarik atas Templar sendiri mistik untuk ritual dan adat istiadat, dan hari ini ada banyak organisasi-organisasi modern yang menarik inspirasi dari memori Jacques de Molay.
Isi [hide]
1 Pemuda
2 Grand Master
2,1 Perjalanan ke Perancis
3 Penangkapan
4 Kematian
4,1 Chinon Perkamen
5 Interpretasi Chinon Perkamen
6 Legends
6,1 Penaklukan Yerusalem
6.2 Kain Kafan dari Turin
6,3 Kutukan
6,4 Freemasonry
7 Referensi
8 Sumber
9 Bacaan lebih lanjut
10 Pranala luar
[Sunting] Pemuda

Sedikit yang diketahui tentang kehidupan awal tahun, tapi Jacques de Molay mungkin lahir di Molay, Haute-Saône di wilayah Burgundi, pada saat sebuah wilayah yang dikuasai oleh Otto III sebagai bagian dari Kekaisaran Romawi Suci, dan di zaman modern dalam daerah Franche-Comté, timur laut Perancis. Tahun kelahirannya tidak pasti, tetapi menilai dari pernyataan yang dibuat selama persidangan kemudian, mungkin antara 1240 dan 1250. Ia lahir karena kebanyakan kesatria Templar itu, dalam sebuah keluarga bangsawan kecil atau menengah. [1]


Pentahbisan Jacques de Molay pada tahun 1265 sebagai seorang Ksatria Templar, di Beaune commandery. Lukisan oleh Marius Granet (1777-1849).
Pada tahun 1265, sebagai seorang pemuda, ia diterima ke dalam Ordo Templar di sebuah kapel di Beaune House, oleh Humbert de Pairaud, para Pengunjung Prancis dan Inggris. Templar terkemuka lain yang hadir adalah Amaury de la Roche, Master Templar provinsi Perancis. [2] [3]
Sekitar 1270, Molay pergi ke Timur (Outremer), meskipun sedikit dikenang dari kegiatan untuk 20 tahun ke depan. [3]
[Sunting] Grand Master

Setelah Kejatuhan Acre ke Mamluk di Mesir 1291, kaum Frank (Eropa) yang mampu melakukannya mundur ke pulau Siprus. Itu menjadi markas besar berkurang Kerajaan Yerusalem, dan operasi dasar untuk masa depan upaya militer oleh pasukan Salib terhadap Mamluk Mesir, yang bagi sebagian mereka secara sistematis menaklukkan Tentara Salib terakhir ada benteng di daratan. Templar di Siprus termasuk Jacques de Molay dan Thibaud Gaudin, 22 Grand Master. Selama pertemuan berkumpul di pulau pada musim gugur 1291, Jacques de Molay berbicara tentang mereformasi Order, dan menempatkan diri maju sebagai alternatif Grand Master saat ini. Gaudin meninggal sekitar 1292, dan karena tidak ada pesaing serius lain untuk peran pada waktu itu, Molay segera terpilih. Pada musim semi 1293, ia mulai tur Barat untuk mencoba dan mengumpulkan lebih banyak dukungan untuk merebut kembali Tanah Suci. Mengembangkan hubungan dengan para pemimpin Eropa seperti Paus Bonifasius VIII, Edward I dari Inggris, James I dari Aragon dan Charles II dari Naples, Molay tujuan langsung adalah untuk memperkuat pertahanan Siprus, dan membangun kembali pasukan Templar. [4] Dari perjalanannya, dia mampu mengamankan otorisasi dari beberapa raja untuk pasokan ekspor ke Siprus, tetapi tidak dapat memperoleh komitmen yang kuat untuk Perang Salib baru. [5] Ada pembicaraan merger Templar dengan salah satu perintah militer lainnya, para Ksatria Hospitaller. Grand Masters dari kedua perintah menentang seperti merger, tapi tekanan meningkat dari Kepausan.
Diketahui bahwa Molay mengadakan dua pertemuan umum perintah di selatan Perancis, di Montpellier pada 1293 dan di Arles pada 1296, di mana ia mencoba untuk membuat reformasi. Pada musim gugur 1296 Molay kembali di Siprus untuk mempertahankan perintahnya bertentangan dengan kepentingan Henry II dari Siprus, yang mempunyai akar konflik kembali di masa Guillaume de Beaujeu.
Dari 1299-1303, Jacques de Molay terlibat dalam perencanaan dan pelaksanaan serangan baru terhadap Mamluk. Rencananya adalah untuk mengkoordinasikan tindakan-tindakan antara perintah militer Kristen, Raja Siprus, aristokrasi Siprus, kekuatan Cilician Armenia, dan sekutu potensial baru, bangsa Mongol dari Ilkhanate (Persia), untuk menentang Mamluk Mesir dan merebut kembali kota pesisir Tortosa di Suriah.


Ghazan, penguasa Mongol dari Ilkhanate, mencari aliansi Franco-Mongol dengan Tentara Salib terhadap Mamluk Mesir, namun tidak pernah berhasil mengkoordinasikan tindakan militer
Selama beberapa generasi, ada komunikasi antara Mongol dan Eropa terhadap kemungkinan menempa aliansi Franco-Mongol terhadap Mamluk, tetapi tidak berhasil. Bangsa Mongol telah berulang kali berusaha untuk menaklukkan Suriah sendiri, setiap kali dipaksa kembali baik oleh Mamluk Mesir, atau harus mundur karena perang saudara di dalam Kekaisaran Mongolia, seperti meminta untuk mempertahankan dari serangan dari Mongol Golden Horde ke utara. Pada 1299, para Ilkhanate lagi berusaha untuk menaklukkan Suriah, memiliki beberapa keberhasilan awal terhadap Mamluk dalam Pertempuran Wadi Al-Khazandar pada bulan Desember 1299. Pada 1300, Jacques de Molay dan kekuatan lain dari Siprus mengumpulkan armada kecil dari 16 kapal yang melakukan penggerebekan di sepanjang pantai Mesir dan Suriah. Gaya yang diperintahkan oleh Raja Henry II dari Yerusalem, raja Siprus, disertai oleh saudaranya, Amalric, Tuhan dari Tirus, dan kepala-kepala perintah militer, dengan duta besar dari pemimpin Mongol Ghazan juga hadir. Kiri kapal Famagusta pada 20 Juli 1300, dan di bawah kepemimpinan Laksamana Baudouin de Picquigny, menggerebek pantai Mesir dan Suriah: Rosette, [6] Alexandria, Acre, Tortosa, dan Maraclea, sebelum kembali ke Siprus. [7]
The Cypriots kemudian siap untuk menyerang Tortosa pada akhir tahun 1300, mengirim pasukan bersama ke daerah pemanggungan di pulau Ruad, dari serangan yang diluncurkan di daratan. Tujuannya adalah untuk membangun jembatan Templar untuk menunggu bantuan dari Ghazan's Mongol, tetapi gagal Mongol muncul di 1300. Hal yang sama terjadi pada 1301 dan 1302, dan akhirnya pulau hilang dalam Pengepungan Ruad pada September 26, 1302, menghilangkan Tentara Salib 'pijakan terakhir di dekat daratan.
Menyusul hilangnya Ruad, Molay meninggalkan taktik pasukan muka kecil, dan bukannya memasukkan energi ke dalam berusaha untuk meningkatkan dukungan untuk mayor baru Perang Salib, serta penguatan otoritas Templar di Siprus. Ketika perebutan kekuasaan meletus antara Raja Henry II dan saudaranya Amalric, didukung Templar Amalric, yang mengambil mahkota dan saudaranya diasingkan tahun 1306. Sementara itu, peningkatan tekanan di Eropa bahwa para Templar harus digabung dengan perintah militer lain, mungkin semua ditempatkan di bawah kekuasaan satu raja, dan bahwa individu itu harus menjadi Raja Yerusalem baru ketika ditaklukkan. [8]
[Sunting] Perjalanan ke Perancis
Pada tahun 1305, yang baru terpilih Paus Klemens V meminta para pemimpin militer pesanan untuk pendapat mereka mengenai perang salib baru dan penggabungan perintah. Jacques de Molay diminta untuk menulis memo pada setiap masalah, yang ia lakukan selama musim panas 1306. [9] Molay menentang merger, alih-alih percaya bahwa memiliki perintah militer terpisah adalah posisi yang lebih kuat, sebagai misi dari masing-masing order agak berbeda. Dia juga dari keyakinan bahwa jika ada menjadi perang salib baru, perlu untuk menjadi besar, sebagai upaya yang lebih kecil tidak efektif. [8] [10]
Pada tanggal 6 Juni, para pemimpin baik Templar dan Hospitaler secara resmi diminta datang ke kantor Kepausan di Poitiers untuk membahas masalah ini, dengan tanggal rapat yang dijadwalkan sebagai All Saints Day tahun 1306, walaupun kemudian terpaksa ditunda karena penyakit Paus dengan gastro-enteritis. Molay meninggalkan Siprus pada 15 Oktober, tiba di Perancis pada akhir 1306 atau awal 1307, namun pertemuan itu kembali ditunda sampai akhir Mei karena penyakit Paus. [10]
Raja Philip IV dari Perancis sedang berperang dengan Inggris, dan banyak utang kepada para Templar. Ia mendukung menggabungkan Pesanan di bawah komandonya sendiri, untuk membuat dirinya Rex Bellator atau Perang Raja, tetapi Molay menolak ide ini. Philip sudah bertentangan dengan kepausan, mencoba pajak ulama, dan telah berusaha untuk menegaskan otoritasnya sendiri sebagai lebih tinggi dari Paus. Untuk ini, salah satu pendahulu Clement, Paus Bonifasius VIII, telah berusaha untuk memiliki Philip dikucilkan, tapi Philip kemudian telah Bonifasius diculik dan didakwa dengan bidah. Bonifasius tua diselamatkan, tetapi kemudian mati kaget segera sesudahnya. Penggantinya Paus Benediktus VIII tidak berlangsung lama, mati dalam waktu kurang dari satu tahun, [11] mungkin diracuni melalui penasihat Philip Guillaume de Nogaret. Butuh waktu setahun untuk memilih Paus berikutnya, orang Prancis Clement V, yang juga berada di bawah tekanan kuat untuk membungkuk untuk Philip akan. Klemens Kepausan pindah dari Italia ke Poitiers, Perancis, di mana Philip tetap berpedoman lebih dominasi atas Kepausan dan Templar.
Pemimpin Hospitaller, Fulk de Villaret juga tertunda dalam perjalanan ke Perancis, karena ia terlibat dengan pertempuran di Rhodes. Dia tidak datang sampai akhir Summer, [10] jadi sambil menunggu kedatangannya, Molay bertemu dengan Paus pada hal-hal lain, salah satunya adalah tuduhan oleh satu atau lebih digulingkan Templar yang telah membuat tuduhan dari ketidakpantasan dalam Templar 'inisiasi upacara. Molay sudah berbicara dengan raja di Paris pada 24 Juni 1307 tentang tuduhan terhadap perintah dan sebagian diyakinkan. Kembali ke Poitiers, Molay meminta Paus untuk mendirikan suatu penyelidikan dengan cepat menghapus Orde rumor dan tuduhan-tuduhan di sekitarnya, dan Paus mengadakan penyelidikan pada tanggal 24 Agustus.
[Sunting] Penangkapan

Pada 14 September, Philip mengambil keuntungan dari rumor dan penyelidikan untuk memulai bergerak melawan Templar, mengirimkan sebuah perintah rahasia kepada agen-agen di seluruh wilayah Perancis untuk melaksanakan penangkapan massa dari semua Templar di waktu fajar pada 13 Oktober. Philip ingin para Templar ditangkap, dan harta benda mereka disita, untuk memasukkan kekayaan mereka ke Royal Treasury. Jacques de Molay berada di Paris pada 12 Oktober, di mana ia menjadi pengusung jenazah di pemakaman Catherine dari Courtenay, istri Pangeran Charles dari Valois, dan adik ipar Raja Philip. Dalam serangan fajar pada Jumat, Oktober 13, 1307, Jacques de Molay dan enam puluh dari saudara Templar ditangkap. Philip kemudian harus diisi dengan Templar bidah dan banyak lainnya yang dibuat-buat tuduhan, sebagian besar yang identik dengan tuduhan-tuduhan yang sebelumnya dilontarkan oleh Philip agen terhadap Paus Bonifasius VIII.


Interogasi Jacques de Molay. Cetak abad ke-19
Selama interogasi paksa oleh agen kerajaan di Universitas Paris pada tanggal 24/25, Molay mengakui bahwa ritual inisiasi Templar termasuk "menyangkal Kristus dan menginjak-injak salib". Ia juga dipaksa untuk menulis surat meminta setiap Templar mengakui tindakan ini. Di bawah tekanan dari Philip IV, Paus Klemens V memerintahkan penangkapan semua Templar di seluruh Kristen.


Jacques de Molay dihukum ke saham di 1314, dari Chronicle dari Perancis atau St Denis (abad keempat belas). Perhatikan bentuk pulau, yang mewakili Île de la Cité (Pulau Kota) di Seine di mana eksekusi berlangsung.
Paus masih ingin mendengar Jacques de Molay's sisi cerita, dan mengirim dua kardinal ke Paris pada bulan Desember 1307. Di depan para kardinal, Molay mencabut pengakuan sebelumnya. Sebuah perebutan kekuasaan terjadi antara raja dan paus, yang menetap di Agustus 1308 ketika mereka sepakat untuk membagi keyakinan. Melalui bula kepausan Faciens misericordiam prosedur penuntutan kepada para Templar telah ditetapkan pada dualitas di mana satu komisi akan menilai individu-individu dari Orde dan komisi yang berbeda akan menilai Orde sebagai suatu entitas. Paus Klemens menyerukan konsili ekumenis untuk bertemu di Wina pada tahun 1310 untuk menentukan masa depan Templar. Sementara itu, pejabat Ordo, di antara mereka Jacques de Molay, itu harus dinilai oleh paus.
Di istana kerajaan di Chinon, Jacques de Molay sekali lagi dipertanyakan oleh para kardinal, tetapi kali ini dengan agen kerajaan hadir, dan dia kembali ke penerimaan dipaksa dibuat di 1307. Pada November 1309, Komisi Kepausan Kerajaan Perancis mulai dengar pendapat sendiri, selama Molay lagi yang menarik kembali, yang menyatakan bahwa ia tidak mengakui tuduhan yang diajukan terhadap perintahnya.


Marker dari tempat eksekusi di Paris. (terjemahan: Di lokasi ini, Jacques de Molay, Grand Master terakhir Knights Templar, dibakar di tiang pada 18 Maret 1314), yang terletak dekat tangga dari Pont-Neuf jembatan. Bagian atas foto ini menunjukkan bagian dari pulau di mana eksekusi berlangsung. Bagian bawah menunjukkan plak, yang terletak di salah satu pilar jembatan, di balik pepohonan.
Oposisi lebih lanjut oleh Templar ini secara efektif rusak ketika Filipus digunakan sebelumnya Pengakuan paksa hukuman 54 Templar untuk dibakar di tiang on May 10-12, 1310.
Dewan yang telah dipanggil untuk 1310 tertunda selama dua tahun karena panjang cobaan, tapi akhirnya diadakan pada 1312. Pada tanggal 22 Maret 1312, di Konsili Vienne, Ordo Templar dihapuskan oleh dekrit kepausan.
Hukuman Molay mengambil dua tahun lagi. Pada tanggal 10 Maret 1314, tiga kardinal yang dikirim oleh Paus Molay dihukum dan tiga lainnya pejabat Templar, Hugues de Pairaud, Geoffroi de Charney dan Geoffroy de Gonneville, penjara seumur hidup. Pairaud dan Gonneville menerima nasib mereka, tetapi 70 tahun Jacques de Molay bangkit berdiri dan kembali menarik kembali publik. Rekannya Geoffroi de Charney rally ke sisinya, dan keduanya keras menyatakan diri tidak bersalah dan Order. Tanggapan Philip adalah memerintahkan keduanya akan dieksekusi segera sebagai bidaah kambuh. malam itu, Jacques de Molay dan Geoffroy de Charney dibawa ke Pulau des Juifs, sekarang dimasukkan ke dalam Île de la Cité di Seine River di pusat kota Paris, di mana mereka dibakar di tiang pancang. Menurut legenda, Jacques de Molay meminta tangannya dibiarkan bebas agar ia bisa menjaga mereka tetap bersama-sama dalam doa, sambil menghadap di dekat Katedral Notre Dame. Lain yang sering diceritakan kisah adalah bahwa ia memanggil keluar dari api yang baik Filipus dan Clement akan segera bertemu dengannya di hadapan Allah. Klemens memang mati karena penyakit hanya beberapa bulan kemudian, dan beberapa bulan setelah itu, Philip tewas dalam kecelakaan berburu.
[Sunting] Kematian

Kematiannya tercatat: "Para kardinal dallied dengan tugas mereka sampai Maret 1314, kapan, di tangga di depan Notre Dame, Jacques de Molay, Grand Master Templar, Geoffroi de Charney, Master of Normandia, Ilugues de Peraud, Pengunjung dari Perancis, dan Godefroi de Gonneville, Master of Aquitaine, dibawa keluar dari penjara di mana selama hampir tujuh tahun mereka berbaring, untuk menerima hukuman yang telah disepakati oleh para kardinal, dalam hubungannya dengan Uskup Agung Sens dan beberapa pejabat tinggi gereja yang lain mereka telah disebut masuk Mengingat pelanggaran yang pelakunya telah mengaku dan dikonfirmasi, dikenakan denda dosa adalah sesuai dengan aturan-yang abadi penjara. Perselingkuhan seharusnya berakhir pada saat, ke cemas dari para pejabat gereja dan kekaguman yang berkumpul kerumunan, de Molay dan Geoffroi de Charney muncul. Mereka telah bersalah, kata mereka, bukan dari kejahatan diperhitungkan kepada mereka, tetapi dgn keji mengkhianati Orde mereka untuk menyelamatkan hidup mereka sendiri. Itu adalah murni dan suci; tuduhan itu fiktif dan pengakuan palsu. tergesa-gesa disampaikan para kardinal Prevot mereka ke Paris, dan pensiun untuk memusyawarahkan kontingensi tak terduga ini, tapi mereka menyelamatkan semua kesulitan. "Ketika berita itu dibawa ke Philippe ia sangat marah. Sebuah konsultasi singkat dengan hanya dewan diperlukan. The kanon mengumumkan bahwa seorang kambuh sesat itu untuk dibakar tanpa mendengar; fakta-fakta yang terkenal dan tidak ada penilaian formal oleh komisi kepausan perlu menunggu. Pada hari yang sama, dengan matahari terbenam, setumpuk didirikan di sebuah pulau kecil di Seine, Isle des Juifs, dekat taman istana. Ada de Molay dan de Charney perlahan-lahan dibakar sampai mati, menolak semua tawaran pengampunan untuk pencabutan, dan bantalan menyiksa mereka dengan ketenangan bagi mereka yang memenangkan reputasi martir di antara orang, yang dikumpulkan dengan hormat mereka sebagai sisa-sisa abu '. [12]
[Sunting] Chinon Perkamen
Pada tahun 2002, Dr Barbara Frale menemukan salinan perkamen Chinon di Arsip Rahasia Vatikan, sebuah dokumen yang secara eksplisit menegaskan bahwa pada 1308 Paus Klemens V membebaskan Jacques de Molay dan para pemimpin lainnya termasuk Ordo Geoffroi de Charney dan Hugues de Pairaud. Ia menerbitkan temuan-temuannya dalam Journal of Medieval History pada tahun 2004. [13]
[Sunting] Interpretasi Chinon Perkamen

Perlu dicatat bahwa dalam Gereja Katolik kata "pengampunan" tidak berarti bahwa orang tidak melakukan dosa, justru sebaliknya, hanya bahwa dia mengakui dosa, berjanji untuk menahan diri dari dosa di masa depan, dan adalah karena itu "membebaskan" atau "diampuni" di mata Tuhan (melalui wakil-Nya di bumi, seorang imam, atau dalam kasus ini Kardinal,) dan dengan demikian dapat memasuki Kerajaan Surga setelah kematian. Apa yang berikut dalam penebusan dosa, atau "hukuman", biasanya dalam bentuk doa atau karya atau perbuatan untuk menunjukkan penyesalan yang benar untuk dosa-dosa yang telah diampuni. Dalam kasus ini, itu bisa, (dan mungkin harus) ditafsirkan bahwa Paus dan / atau Cardinals, takut Templar mungkin akan mati prematur, ingin melanjutkan kepalsuan mereka dengan Raja Perancis dalam membuat Templar mengakui kepada Allah dan orang lain yang baik tahu arti dari "pengampunan" bahwa mereka, pada kenyataannya, bersalah atas kejahatan diisi.
[Sunting] Legenda

Tiba-tiba penangkapan Templar, cerita tentang pengakuan yang saling bertentangan, dan kematian dramatis dengan membakar, dihasilkan banyak cerita dan legenda tentang baik Order, dan yang terakhir Grand Master.
[Sunting] Penaklukan Yerusalem


"The capture dari Yerusalem oleh Jacques de Molay di 1299", oleh Claude Jacquand, Versailles, Musée et Trianons Chateau Nasional. Gambaran ini ditugaskan di tahun 1800-an, tetapi adalah tentang sebuah peristiwa di 1299 yang tidak benar-benar terjadi. Tidak ada pertempuran, dan Molay tidak berada di dekat Yerusalem pada waktu itu. [3] Dalam kenyataannya, setelah orang-orang Kristen kehilangan kendali atas Yerusalem pada tahun 1244 itu tidak di bawah kendali Kristen lagi sampai 1917, ketika Inggris mengambil dari Utsmani.
Di Perancis pada abad ke-19, kisah-kisah palsu beredar bahwa Jacques de Molay telah merebut Yerusalem pada tahun 1300. Desas-desus ini mungkin berkaitan dengan fakta bahwa sejarawan abad pertengahan yang Templar Tirus menulis tentang seorang jenderal Mongol bernama "Mulay" yang menduduki Suriah dan Palestina selama beberapa bulan pada awal 1300. [14] The Mongol Mulay dan Templar Jacques de Molay orang yang sama sekali berbeda, tetapi beberapa sejarawan bingung secara teratur dua.
Kebingungan itu disempurnakan pada 1805, ketika Prancis dramawan / sejarawan François Raynouard membuat klaim bahwa Yerusalem telah ditangkap oleh Mongol, dengan Jacques de Molay yang bertanggung jawab atas salah satu divisi Mongol. [14] "Pada 1299, Grand-Master adalah dengan mengambil kesatria di Yerusalem. "[15] Ini kisah tentang angan-angan begitu populer di Prancis, yang pada tahun 1846 sebuah lukisan berskala besar diciptakan oleh Claude Jacquand, berjudul Molay prend Yerusalem, 1299 (" Membawa Molay Yerusalem , 1299 "), yang menggambarkan peristiwa yang seharusnya. Hari ini lukisan menggantung di Aula Perang Salib di museum nasional Perancis di Versailles. [16]
Dalam edisi 1861 Perancis bebas, yang Nouvelle Biographie Universelle, bahkan daftar Jacques de Molay sebagai komandan Mongol dalam "Molay" artikel:
"Jacques de Molay juga tidak aktif dalam keputusan ini, Khan Agung. Hal ini dibuktikan oleh fakta bahwa dalam perintah Molay salah satu sayap pasukan Mongol. Dengan pasukan di bawah kekuasaannya, ia menyerang Suriah, berpartisipasi dalam pertempuran pertama di mana Sultan kalah, mengejar Nasir Malik mengalahkan sejauh gurun Mesir: kemudian, di bawah bimbingan Kutluk, seorang jenderal Mongol, ia mampu mengambil Yerusalem, di antara kota-kota lain, atas umat Islam, dan Mongol masuk untuk merayakan Paskah "
- Nouvelle Biographie Universelle, "Molay" artikel, 1861. [14]
Sejarawan modern Namun, menyatakan bahwa kebenaran masalah adalah ini: Memang ada banyak catatan kuno serangan Mongol dan pekerjaan dari Yerusalem (baik dari Barat, Armenia atau sumber Arab), dan tahun 1300 Mongol telah mencapai kemenangan singkat di Suriah yang menyebabkan seorang muslim mundur, dan membiarkan Mongol untuk memulai serangan ke kawasan Mediterania timur sejauh Gaza selama beberapa bulan. Selama tahun itu, desas-desus terbang melalui Eropa bahwa Mongol telah merebut kembali Yerusalem dan akan kembali ke kota Eropa. Namun, ini hanya sebuah legenda perkotaan, sebagai satu-satunya kegiatan yang bangsa Mongol bahkan telah terlibat dalam beberapa minor penggerebekan melalui Palestina, yang mungkin atau mungkin tidak memiliki bahkan melewati Yerusalem sendiri. [3] [17] Dan terlepas dari apa yang Mongol mungkin atau mungkin tidak dilakukan, Jacques de Molay tidak pernah menjadi komandan Mongol, dan mungkin tidak pernah menginjakkan kaki di Yerusalem.
[Sunting] Kain Kafan dari Turin
Freemason sering menenun legenda di sekitar kehidupan dan warisan Jacques de Molay, mengklaim dengan sedikit atau tanpa bukti bahwa Molay tokoh kunci lain yang berhubungan dengan kisah-kisah misteri. Dalam buku tahun 2001 Mesias Kedua: Templar, Kain Kafan Turin, dan Great Secret of Freemasonry, adalah klaim bahwa Kain Kafan Turin sebenarnya gambar Jacques de Molay, bukan Yesus Kristus sebagai adalah kepercayaan umum.
Tidak ada dasar yang dapat dipercaya mengatakan bahwa Kain Kafan Molay menggambarkan, namun memang benar bahwa tampaknya ada hubungan antara asalnya dari Kain Kafan dari Turin dan Templar. Perancis Knight Geoffroi de Charny 's janda, Jeanne de Vergy, adalah yang pertama tercatat terpercaya pemilik kain kafan Turin. Beberapa percaya bahwa suaminya nama serupa adalah keponakan untuk Geoffroi de Charney Geoffroi de Charney, pembimbing dari Normandia untuk Ksatria Templar, dan rekan Jacques de Molay yang keduanya dihukum penjara seumur hidup dengan dia, dan kemudian dibakar di tiang dengan dia di 1314 setelah keduanya menyatakan mereka tidak bersalah.
[Sunting] Kutukan
Dikatakan bahwa Jacques de Molay mengutuk Raja Philip IV dari Perancis dan keturunannya dari eksekusi tumpukan kayu bakar. Cerita tentang kutukan berteriak tampaknya merupakan kombinasi kata-kata oleh Templar yang berbeda, dan orang-orang dari Jacques de Molay. Seorang saksi mata menyatakan bahwa eksekusi Molay tidak menunjukkan tanda-tanda rasa takut, dan mengatakan kepada mereka yang hadir bahwa Tuhan akan membalaskan dendam kematian mereka. [18] Variasi lain di cerita ini diceritakan oleh penulis sejarah kontemporer Ferretto dari Vicenza, yang menerapkan ide untuk sebuah neapolitan Templar dibawa sebelum Klemens V, yang ia mencela untuk ketidakadilan. Beberapa waktu kemudian, ketika ia akan dihukum mati, dia mengajukan banding 'dari penilaian keji Anda ini ke ruang dan Allah yang benar, yang berada di Surga', peringatan Paus bahwa dalam tahun satu hari, ia dan Philip IV akan diwajibkan untuk menjawab atas kejahatan mereka di hadapan Allah. [19]
Memang benar bahwa Philip dan Klemens V keduanya meninggal dalam tahun Molay eksekusi, Clement akhirnya menyerah pada penyakit yang lama pada April 20, 1314 dan Philip dalam kecelakaan berburu. Kemudian diikuti berturut-turut cepat yang terakhir Capetia langsung raja-raja dari Perancis antara 1314 dan 1328, tiga anak-anak Philip IV. Dalam jangka waktu 14 tahun dari kematian Jacques de Molay, 300 tahun House of Capet runtuh. Rangkaian peristiwa ini membentuk dasar dari Les Rois Maudits (The Terkutuklah Raja-raja), rangkaian novel sejarah yang ditulis oleh Maurice Druon antara tahun 1955 dan 1977, dan yang juga berubah menjadi dua miniseri televisi Perancis pada tahun 1972 dan 2005. [Rujukan?]
Di kejauhan Jerman, Philip kematian dibicarakan sebagai pembalasan atas penghancuran Templar, dan Clement digambarkan sebagai penumpahan air mata penyesalan di tempat tidur kematiannya selama tiga kejahatan besar, yang peracunan Henry VI, dan kehancuran Templar dan Beguines. [20]
[Sunting] Freemasonry
400 tahun setelah kematian Jacques de Molay dan pembubaran Ksatria Templar, urutan persaudaraan Freemasonry mulai muncul di Eropa bagian utara. Dikembangkan para Mason mitos yang rumit tentang Orde mereka, dan beberapa mengklaim warisan dari entitas dalam sejarah, [21] mulai dari mistik Templar ke pembangun Bait Salomo dan piramida. Cerita tentang Jacques de Molay's berani menentang dari inkuisitor, telah dimasukkan dalam berbagai bentuk menjadi pengetahuan Masonik. Beberapa kelompok pemuda modern di Freemasonry bahkan diberi nama setelah Grand Master, seperti DeMolay Internasional. Kisah-kisah para Templar upacara inisiasi rahasia juga membuktikan sebuah sumber menggoda penulis Masonik yang menciptakan karya-karya baru pseudohistory. Seperti dijelaskan oleh sejarawan modern Malcolm Barber dalam The New Knighthood: "Itu selama 1760s bahwa tukang batu Jerman memperkenalkan sebuah koneksi Templar tertentu, menyatakan bahwa Ordo, melalui pendudukan Bait Salomo, telah repositori rahasia kebijaksanaan dan magis kekuasaan, yang Yakobus Molay diwariskan kepada penerusnya sebelum eksekusi dan yang kedelapan belas abad Freemason adalah ahli waris langsung. "[22]